TY - JOUR
T1 - “Horned cattle and pack horses”
T2 - zooarchaeological legacy collections from the unauthorized (and unscreened) Spanish Fort
AU - Pavao-Zuckerman, Barnet
AU - Mayfield, Tracie
AU - Copperstone, Chance
AU - Foster, H. Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2018.
PY - 2018/9/2
Y1 - 2018/9/2
N2 - In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.
AB - In 1689, the governor of La Florida ordered the construction of a fort near the Muscogee (Creek) ancestral community of Apalachicola, supplying it with a caravan of “horned cattle and pack horses.” The fort, referred to as “Spanish Fort,” was abandoned a year later. Archaeological investigations of the fort were carried out in 1960 without sieving, and a large collection of faunal remains was minimally studied. Despite the limitations of the recovery methods, a recent analysis of these zooarchaeological legacy collections provides insight into the provisioning strategies of the Spanish military 150 years after initial colonialism began. Spanish Fort was better provisioned than its predecessors, such as Fort San Juan, but with a limited range of domesticated livestock—only cattle and horses. The presidio may have traded with the Apalachicola community in order to diversify their diet, but butchering marks indicate that the presidio’s soldiers processed their own meat at the fort. Having learned hard lessons from earlier colonial expeditions, Spanish military colonialists minimized the outpost’s vulnerability by not relying heavily on the local Native American population, while building a transactional relationship with Apalachicola to ensure the community’s cooperation. The zooarchaeological materials from Spanish Fort also indicate that the fort was intentionally destroyed by fire, providing a glimpse of Spanish adaptive strategies as the mission of securing the inland Southeast from rival colonialism abruptly ended.
KW - Zooarchaeology
KW - colonialism
KW - seventeenth century
KW - southeastern North America
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055354796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055354796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133
DO - 10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055354796
SN - 0734-578X
VL - 37
SP - 190
EP - 203
JO - Southeastern Archaeology
JF - Southeastern Archaeology
IS - 3
ER -