Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Holistic Treatment Response: An International Expert Panel Definition and Criteria for a New Paradigm in the Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation

  • Robert M. Levy
  • , Nagy Mekhail
  • , Alaa Abd-Elsayed
  • , David Abejón
  • , Magdalena Anitescu
  • , Timothy R. Deer
  • , Sam Eldabe
  • , Lisa Goudman
  • , Jan W. Kallewaard
  • , Maarten Moens
  • , Erika A. Petersen
  • , Julie G. Pilitsis
  • , Jason E. Pope
  • , Lawrence Poree
  • , Ahmed M. Raslan
  • , Marc Russo
  • , Dawood Sayed
  • , Peter S. Staats
  • , Rod S. Taylor
  • , Simon Thomson
  • Paul Verrills, Rui V. Duarte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Treatment response to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is focused on the magnitude of effects on pain intensity. However, chronic pain is a multidimensional condition that may affect individuals in different ways and as such it seems reductionist to evaluate treatment response based solely on a unidimensional measure such as pain intensity. Aim: The aim of this article is to add to a framework started by IMMPACT for assessing the wider health impact of treatment with SCS for people with chronic pain, a ”holistic treatment response”. Discussion: Several aspects need consideration in the assessment of a holistic treatment response. SCS device data and how it relates to patient outcomes, is essential to improve the understanding of the different types of SCS, improve patient selection, long-term clinical outcomes, and reproducibility of findings. The outcomes to include in the evaluation of a holistic treatment response need to consider clinical relevance for patients and clinicians. Assessment of the holistic response combines two key concepts of patient assessment: (1) patients level of baseline (pre-treatment) unmet need across a range of health domains; (2) demonstration of patient-relevant improvements in these health domains with treatment. The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) is an established approach to reflect changes after a clinical intervention that are meaningful for the patient and can be used to identify treatment response to each individual domain. A holistic treatment response needs to account for MCIDs in all domains of importance for which the patient presents dysfunctional scores pre-treatment. The number of domains included in a holistic treatment response may vary and should be considered on an individual basis. Physiologic confirmation of therapy delivery and utilisation should be included as part of the evaluation of a holistic treatment response and is essential to advance the field of SCS and increase transparency and reproducibility of the findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1015-1022
Number of pages8
JournalNeuromodulation
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • holistic treatment response
  • minimal clinical important difference
  • physiologic confirmation of therapy
  • spinal cord stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Holistic Treatment Response: An International Expert Panel Definition and Criteria for a New Paradigm in the Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this