Abstract
When contracts are incomplete or unenforceable, inefficient levels of investment may occur because of hold-up. If individuals care for negative reciprocity, these problems may be reduced, as revenge becomes a credible threat. However, negative reciprocity has this effect only when the investor holds the rights of control of the investment proceeds. We explore this issue analytically, deriving predictions for hold-up games which differ as regards assignment of rights of control. We also test and support these predictions in an experiment.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 896-908 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Economic Inquiry |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business, Management and Accounting
- Economics and Econometrics