TY - CHAP
T1 - Hippocampal complex contribution to retention and retrieval of recent and remote episodic and semantic memories
T2 - Evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies of healthy and brain-damaged people
AU - Moscovitch, Morris
AU - Westmacott, Robyn
AU - Gilboa, Asaf
AU - Addis, Donna Rose
AU - Rosenbaum, R. Shayna
AU - Viskontas, Indre
AU - Priselac, Sandra
AU - Svoboda, Eva
AU - Ziegler, Marilyne
AU - Black, Sandra
AU - Gao, Fuqiang
AU - Grady, Cheryl
AU - Freedman, Morris
AU - Köhler, Stefan
AU - Leach, Larry
AU - Levine, Brian
AU - McAndrews, Mary Pat
AU - Nadel, Lynn
AU - Proulx, Guy
AU - Richards, Brian
AU - Ryan, Lee
AU - Stokes, Kathryn
AU - Winocur, Gordon
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - For over a hundred years, it has been accepted that remote memories are less vulnerable to disruption than are recent memories. The standard consolidation model posits that the hippocampus and related structures are temporary memory structures, necessary for acquisition, retention, and retrieval of all explicit (declarative) memories until they are consolidated elsewhere in the brain. We review lesion and neuroimaging evidence showing that important distinctions exist among different types of explicit memory and the structures that mediate them. We argue that retention and retrieval of detailed, vivid autobiographical memories depend on the hippocampal system no matter how long ago they were acquired. Semantic memories, on the other hand, benefit from hippocampal contribution for some time before they can be retrieved independently of the hippocampus. Even semantic memories, however, can have episodic elements associated with them which continue to depend on the hippocampus. In short, the evidence reviewed suggests strongly that the function of the hippocampus (and possibly of related limbic structures) is to help encode, retain, and retrieve experiences, no matter how long ago the events comprising the experience occurred. We conclude that the evidence favors a multiple trace theory (MTT) of memory over the traditional model, and we indicate what future work is needed to resolve disputes.
AB - For over a hundred years, it has been accepted that remote memories are less vulnerable to disruption than are recent memories. The standard consolidation model posits that the hippocampus and related structures are temporary memory structures, necessary for acquisition, retention, and retrieval of all explicit (declarative) memories until they are consolidated elsewhere in the brain. We review lesion and neuroimaging evidence showing that important distinctions exist among different types of explicit memory and the structures that mediate them. We argue that retention and retrieval of detailed, vivid autobiographical memories depend on the hippocampal system no matter how long ago they were acquired. Semantic memories, on the other hand, benefit from hippocampal contribution for some time before they can be retrieved independently of the hippocampus. Even semantic memories, however, can have episodic elements associated with them which continue to depend on the hippocampus. In short, the evidence reviewed suggests strongly that the function of the hippocampus (and possibly of related limbic structures) is to help encode, retain, and retrieve experiences, no matter how long ago the events comprising the experience occurred. We conclude that the evidence favors a multiple trace theory (MTT) of memory over the traditional model, and we indicate what future work is needed to resolve disputes.
KW - Autobiographical Memory
KW - Consolidation
KW - Episodic Memory
KW - Hippocampus
KW - Medial Temporal Lobes
KW - Semantic Memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14544306098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14544306098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/4-431-27431-6_14
DO - 10.1007/4-431-27431-6_14
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:14544306098
SN - 4431239995
SN - 9784431239994
SP - 333
EP - 380
BT - Dynamic Cognitive Processes
PB - Springer Tokyo
ER -