Abstract
We have calculated all significant terms through third order in the reaction matrix G which contribute to the perturbation series for the J = 0, T = 1 effective interaction between two valence nucleons in the mass-18 nuclei and also a few selected fourth-order terms. We have shown that the perturbation series does not converge order-by-order to third order in G and that certain large third-order terms tend to cancel the second-order contribution. An intuitive physical picture of the process giving rise to this effect and to analogous effects in related calculations of the effective charge is given. This picture suggests a rearrangement of the perturbation series into physically significant groups of diagrams, so that each group converges order-by-order in G. However, one must then find some way to sum all these groups of diagrams. We conclude that simple perturbation theory is not a reliable method for calculating the effective two-nucleon interaction in mass-18 nuclei, when currently standard calculational techniques are used, and that the success of first- plus second-order perturbation theory in fitting experimental spectra for these nuclei is unexplained.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-180 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Nuclear Physics A |
| Volume | 148 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 8 1970 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Higher-order terms and the apparent non-convergence of the perturbation expansion for the effective interaction in finite nuclei'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS