High performance biological pairwise sequence alignment: FPGA versus GPU versus cell BE versus GPP

Khaled Benkrid, Ali Akoglu, Cheng Ling, Yang Song, Ying Liu, Xiang Tian

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations


This paper explores the pros and cons of reconfigurable computing in the form of FPGAs for high performance efficient computing. In particular, the paper presents the results of a comparative study between three different acceleration technologies, namely, Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Graphics Processor Units (GPUs), and IBM's Cell Broadband Engine (Cell BE), in the design and implementation of the widely-used Smith-Waterman pairwise sequence alignment algorithm, with general purpose processors as a base reference implementation. Comparison criteria include speed, energy consumption, and purchase and development costs. The study shows that FPGAs largely outperform all other implementation platforms on performance per watt criterion and perform better than all other platforms on performance per dollar criterion, although by a much smaller margin. Cell BE and GPU come second and third, respectively, on both performance per watt and performance per dollar criteria. In general, in order to outperform other technologies on performance per dollar criterion (using currently available hardware and development tools), FPGAs need to achieve at least two orders of magnitude speed-up compared to general-purpose processors and one order of magnitude speed-up compared to domain-specific technologies such as GPUs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number752910
JournalInternational Journal of Reconfigurable Computing
StatePublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hardware and Architecture


Dive into the research topics of 'High performance biological pairwise sequence alignment: FPGA versus GPU versus cell BE versus GPP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this