TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
AU - on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)
AU - Hinchliffe, Robert J.
AU - Forsythe, Rachael O.
AU - Apelqvist, Jan
AU - Boyko, Edward J.
AU - Fitridge, Robert
AU - Hong, Joon Pio
AU - Katsanos, Konstantinos
AU - Mills, Joseph L.
AU - Nikol, Sigrid
AU - Reekers, Jim
AU - Venermo, Maarit
AU - Zierler, R. Eugene
AU - Schaper, Nicolaas C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Production of the 2019 IWGDF Guidelines was supported by unrestricted grants from Molnlycke Healthcare, Acelity, ConvaTec, Urgo Medical, Edixomed, Klaveness, Reapplix, Podartis, Aurealis, SoftOx, Woundcare Circle, and Essity. These sponsors did not have any communication related to the systematic reviews of the literature or related to the guidelines with working group members during the writing of the guidelines and have not seen any guideline or guideline‐related document before publication. All individual conflict of interest statement of authors of this guideline can be found at: https://iwgdfguidelines.org/about-iwgdf-guidelines/biographies/
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the following external expert reviewers for their review of our PICOs and guideline for clinical relevance: Stephan Morbach (Germany), Heidi Corcoran (Hongkong), Vilma Urbančič (Slovenia), Rica Tanaka (Japan), Florian Dick (Switzerland), Taha Wassila (Egypt), Abdul Basit (Pakistan), Yamile Jubiz (Colombia), Sriram Narayanan (Singapore), and Eduardo Alvarez (Cuba).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes and updates the previous IWGDF Guideline. Up to 50% of patients with diabetes and foot ulceration have concurrent PAD, which confers a significantly elevated risk of adverse limb events and cardiovascular disease. We know that the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of these patients are markedly different to patients with diabetes who do not have PAD and yet there are few good quality studies addressing this important subset of patients. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the patient-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) format, to conduct a systematic review of the medical-scientific literature, and to write recommendations and their rationale. The recommendations are based on the quality of evidence found in the systematic review, expert opinion where evidence was not available, and a weighing of the benefits and harms, patient preferences, feasibility and applicability, and costs related to the intervention. We here present the updated 2019 guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of PAD in patients with a foot ulcer and diabetes, and we suggest some key future topics of particular research interest.
AB - The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes and updates the previous IWGDF Guideline. Up to 50% of patients with diabetes and foot ulceration have concurrent PAD, which confers a significantly elevated risk of adverse limb events and cardiovascular disease. We know that the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of these patients are markedly different to patients with diabetes who do not have PAD and yet there are few good quality studies addressing this important subset of patients. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to devise clinical questions and critically important outcomes in the patient-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) format, to conduct a systematic review of the medical-scientific literature, and to write recommendations and their rationale. The recommendations are based on the quality of evidence found in the systematic review, expert opinion where evidence was not available, and a weighing of the benefits and harms, patient preferences, feasibility and applicability, and costs related to the intervention. We here present the updated 2019 guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of PAD in patients with a foot ulcer and diabetes, and we suggest some key future topics of particular research interest.
KW - diabetic foot
KW - diagnosis
KW - foot ulcer
KW - guidelines
KW - peripheral artery disease
KW - prognosis
KW - surgery
KW - vascular disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078771544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078771544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/dmrr.3276
DO - 10.1002/dmrr.3276
M3 - Article
C2 - 31958217
AN - SCOPUS:85078771544
SN - 1520-7552
VL - 36
JO - Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
JF - Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
IS - S1
M1 - e3276
ER -