TY - JOUR
T1 - Ground-based inhibition
T2 - Suppressive perceptual mechanisms interact with top-down attention to reduce distractor interference
AU - Wager, Erica
AU - Peterson, Mary A.
AU - Folstein, Jonathan R.
AU - Scalf, Paige E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 ARVO.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Successful attentional function requires inhibition of distracting information (e.g., Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963). Similarly, perceptual segregation of the visual world into figure and ground entails ground suppression (e.g., Likova & Tyler, 2008; Peterson & Skow, 2008). Here, we ask whether the suppressive processes of attention and perception-distractor inhibition and ground suppression-interact to more effectively insulate task performance from interfering information. We used a variant of the Eriksen flanker paradigm to assess the efficacy of distractor inhibition. Participants indicated the right/left orientation of a central arrow, which could be flanked by congruent, neutral, or incongruent stimuli. We manipulated the degree to which the ground region of a display was suppressed and measured the influence of this manipulation on the efficacy with which participants could inhibit responses from incongruent flankers. Greater ground suppression reduced the influence on target identification of interfering, incongruent information, but not that of facilitative, congruent information. These data are the first to show that distractor inhibition interacts with ground suppression to improve attentional function.
AB - Successful attentional function requires inhibition of distracting information (e.g., Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963). Similarly, perceptual segregation of the visual world into figure and ground entails ground suppression (e.g., Likova & Tyler, 2008; Peterson & Skow, 2008). Here, we ask whether the suppressive processes of attention and perception-distractor inhibition and ground suppression-interact to more effectively insulate task performance from interfering information. We used a variant of the Eriksen flanker paradigm to assess the efficacy of distractor inhibition. Participants indicated the right/left orientation of a central arrow, which could be flanked by congruent, neutral, or incongruent stimuli. We manipulated the degree to which the ground region of a display was suppressed and measured the influence of this manipulation on the efficacy with which participants could inhibit responses from incongruent flankers. Greater ground suppression reduced the influence on target identification of interfering, incongruent information, but not that of facilitative, congruent information. These data are the first to show that distractor inhibition interacts with ground suppression to improve attentional function.
KW - Attention
KW - Distractor inhibition
KW - Figure-ground segregation
KW - Ground suppression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84935493808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84935493808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1167/15.8.9
DO - 10.1167/15.8.9
M3 - Article
C2 - 26114672
AN - SCOPUS:84935493808
SN - 1534-7362
VL - 15
JO - Journal of Vision
JF - Journal of Vision
IS - 8
M1 - 9
ER -