Abstract
T. H. Green claimed that 'rights are made by recognition. There is no right but thinking makes it so'. This 'rights recognition thesis' is widely rejected. I argue in this article that, so far from being an idiosyncratic doctrine of 19th-century British Idealism, the rights recognition thesis implies a compelling conception of rights, and one that, surprisingly, is more in tune with contemporary meta-ethics than are many contemporary rights theories. Green's moral theory, I argue, is a form of the widely embraced doctrine of 'moral internalism'. Such internalism, conjoined with a generally embraced analysis of rights, leads to some version of the rights recognition thesis.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-17 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | British Journal of Politics and International Relations |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2005 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Political Science and International Relations
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Green's rights recognition thesis and moral internalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS