TY - GEN
T1 - Graph Drawing via Gradient Descent, (GD)2
AU - Ahmed, Reyan
AU - De Luca, Felice
AU - Devkota, Sabin
AU - Kobourov, Stephen
AU - Li, Mingwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Readability criteria, such as distance or neighborhood preservation, are often used to optimize node-link representations of graphs to enable the comprehension of the underlying data. With few exceptions, graph drawing algorithms typically optimize one such criterion, usually at the expense of others. We propose a layout approach, Graph Drawing via Gradient Descent, (GD)2, that can handle multiple readability criteria. (GD)2 can optimize any criterion that can be described by a smooth function. If the criterion cannot be captured by a smooth function, a non-smooth function for the criterion is combined with another smooth function, or auto-differentiation tools are used for the optimization. Our approach is flexible and can be used to optimize several criteria that have already been considered earlier (e.g., obtaining ideal edge lengths, stress, neighborhood preservation) as well as other criteria which have not yet been explicitly optimized in such fashion (e.g., vertex resolution, angular resolution, aspect ratio). We provide quantitative and qualitative evidence of the effectiveness of (GD)2 with experimental data and a functional prototype: http://hdc.cs.arizona.edu/~mwli/graph-drawing/.
AB - Readability criteria, such as distance or neighborhood preservation, are often used to optimize node-link representations of graphs to enable the comprehension of the underlying data. With few exceptions, graph drawing algorithms typically optimize one such criterion, usually at the expense of others. We propose a layout approach, Graph Drawing via Gradient Descent, (GD)2, that can handle multiple readability criteria. (GD)2 can optimize any criterion that can be described by a smooth function. If the criterion cannot be captured by a smooth function, a non-smooth function for the criterion is combined with another smooth function, or auto-differentiation tools are used for the optimization. Our approach is flexible and can be used to optimize several criteria that have already been considered earlier (e.g., obtaining ideal edge lengths, stress, neighborhood preservation) as well as other criteria which have not yet been explicitly optimized in such fashion (e.g., vertex resolution, angular resolution, aspect ratio). We provide quantitative and qualitative evidence of the effectiveness of (GD)2 with experimental data and a functional prototype: http://hdc.cs.arizona.edu/~mwli/graph-drawing/.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102737554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102737554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-68766-3_1
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-68766-3_1
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85102737554
SN - 9783030687656
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 3
EP - 17
BT - Graph Drawing and Network Visualization - 28th International Symposium, GD 2020, Revised Selected Papers
A2 - Auber, David
A2 - Valtr, Pavel
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 28th International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, GD 2020
Y2 - 16 September 2020 through 18 September 2020
ER -