TY - JOUR
T1 - Governing a shared hidden resource
T2 - A review of governance mechanisms for transboundary groundwater security
AU - Albrecht, Tamee R.
AU - Varady, Robert G.
AU - Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A.
AU - Gerlak, Andrea K.
AU - Staddon, Chad
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was undertaken as part of the International Water Security Network, a project funded by Lloyd’s Register Foundation, a charitable foundation helping to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement and the application of research. We further acknowledge the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), for Project SGP-CRA005, supported by U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant No. GEO-1138881. The paper also benefited from support by the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation in Tucson, Arizona. Finally, the authors are grateful for the support and advice received from Christopher A. Scott of the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy at the University of Arizona. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Globally, groundwater is by far the largest store of liquid freshwater, making it a key component of a secure water supply. However, over the past few decades the amount of usable groundwater available around the world has rapidly decreased. This depletion is caused primarily by mismanagement (e.g., overpumping, contamination, and under-regulation), but also by reduced natural recharge due to climate change and urbanization. Management of groundwater resources is particularly challenging for the nearly 600 aquifers that are transboundary, meaning that they extend across international political borders. To understand how governance mechanisms can reduce water insecurity in transboundary groundwater contexts, we review key literature from what we view as the most relevant fields: groundwater management, water security, international water law and international water governance. We then formulate a set of recommendations for improved groundwater governance that can address the specific physical nature of groundwater systems, enhance water security, and apply to transboundary groundwater settings. We argue that groundwater governance in transboundary contexts requires processes that (1) enhance context-specific and flexible international mechanisms; (2) address the perpetual need for groundwater data and information; (3) prioritize the precautionary principle and pollution prevention, in particular; (4) where appropriate, integrate governance of surface and subsurface water and land; and (5) expand institutional capacity, especially of binational or multinational actors.
AB - Globally, groundwater is by far the largest store of liquid freshwater, making it a key component of a secure water supply. However, over the past few decades the amount of usable groundwater available around the world has rapidly decreased. This depletion is caused primarily by mismanagement (e.g., overpumping, contamination, and under-regulation), but also by reduced natural recharge due to climate change and urbanization. Management of groundwater resources is particularly challenging for the nearly 600 aquifers that are transboundary, meaning that they extend across international political borders. To understand how governance mechanisms can reduce water insecurity in transboundary groundwater contexts, we review key literature from what we view as the most relevant fields: groundwater management, water security, international water law and international water governance. We then formulate a set of recommendations for improved groundwater governance that can address the specific physical nature of groundwater systems, enhance water security, and apply to transboundary groundwater settings. We argue that groundwater governance in transboundary contexts requires processes that (1) enhance context-specific and flexible international mechanisms; (2) address the perpetual need for groundwater data and information; (3) prioritize the precautionary principle and pollution prevention, in particular; (4) where appropriate, integrate governance of surface and subsurface water and land; and (5) expand institutional capacity, especially of binational or multinational actors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048114246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048114246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.11.002
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85048114246
SN - 2468-3124
VL - 2
SP - 43
EP - 56
JO - Water Security
JF - Water Security
ER -