Abstract
In this article the authors develop goodness-of-fit tests for fuzzy-set analyses to formally assess the fit between empirical information and various causal hypotheses while accounting for measurement error in membership scores. These goodness-of-fit tests, and the accompanying logic, provide a sound inferential foundation for fuzzy-set methodology. The authors also develop descriptive measures to complement these tests. Examples from Stryker and Eliason (2003) and Mahoney (2003) show how goodness-of-fit tests and descriptive measures may be used to assess individual causal factors as well as conjunctions of factors. The authors show how these tools provide more information in a fuzzy-set analysis than do tests currently in use. In providing this inferential foundation, the authors also show that fuzzy-set methods (a) are no less amenable to falsificationist methods of the Neyman-Pearson type than are standard statistical techniques and (b) may be usefully applied in either an exploratory/inductive or a confirmatory/deductive research design.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 102-146 |
Number of pages | 45 |
Journal | Sociological Methods and Research |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2009 |
Keywords
- Causal inference
- Fuzzy-set
- Goodness-of-fit
- Necessity
- Sufficiency
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science