TY - JOUR
T1 - Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level
T2 - Are there any correlations with outcomes? Outcomes of Geriatric Patients in Trauma Centers
AU - El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled
AU - Magnotti, Louis J.
AU - Hosseinpour, Hamidreza
AU - Nelson, Adam
AU - Spencer, Audrey L.
AU - Anand, Tanya
AU - Bhogadi, Sai Krishna
AU - Alizai, Qaidar
AU - Ditillo, Michael
AU - Joseph, Bellal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Introduction: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients’ outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. Study Design: Patients ≥65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017–2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. Results: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2–9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.
AB - Introduction: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients’ outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. Study Design: Patients ≥65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017–2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. Results: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2–9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.
KW - Frailty
KW - Geriatric trauma
KW - Trauma
KW - Trauma centers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167778752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85167778752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110972
DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110972
M3 - Article
C2 - 37573210
AN - SCOPUS:85167778752
SN - 0020-1383
VL - 55
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
IS - 1
M1 - 110972
ER -