Genotype-specific fitness cost of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in pink bollworm

Yves Carrière, Jennifer L. Williams, David W. Crowder, Bruce E. Tabashnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve resistance management strategies for Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops, a better understanding of the relative fitness of pest genotypes with resistance alleles in the absence of Bt toxins is needed. Here, we evaluated the impact of costs of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac on the relative fitness of specific pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) genotypes. We created two heterogeneous strains with an intermediate frequency of mutant cadherin alleles linked with resistance to Cry1Ac, reared the strains on diet without Bt and tracked the decline in frequency of resistant genotypes for 15–30 generations using polymerase chain reaction amplification. We used a population genetics model and sensitivity analyses to estimate the relative fitness of resistant genotypes. RESULTS: Costs were completely recessive in one strain and almost completely recessive in the other. Estimates of the decline in relative fitness of the resistant homozygotes fed on a diet without Bt were 14–22% in one strain and 21–36% in the other. CONCLUSION: Our genotype-specific cost estimates and the results of studies discussed herein indicate that costs associated with resistance to Bt are often large enough to significantly delay the evolution of resistance to pyramided Bt crops in pests with recessive inheritance of resistance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2496-2503
Number of pages8
JournalPest management science
Volume74
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Bacillus thuringiensis
  • cadherin
  • resistance management
  • transgenic plants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Insect Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genotype-specific fitness cost of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in pink bollworm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this