TY - JOUR
T1 - Genetic research with Indigenous Peoples
T2 - perspectives on governance and oversight in the US
AU - Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
AU - Carroll, Stephanie Russo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Garrison and Carroll.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Indigenous Peoples are increasingly exerting governance and oversight over genomic research with citizens of their nations, raising questions about how best to enforce research regulation between American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian peoples and researchers. Methods: Using a community-engaged research approach, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with Tribal leaders, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and Tribal research review board members about their perspectives on ethical issues related to genetics research with Indigenous Peoples in the US. Results: We report findings related to (1) considerations for Indigenous governance, (2) institutional relationships upholding sovereignty, (3) expectations for research approvals, and (4) agreements enacting Indigenous governance. Participants described concerns about different ways of exerting oversight, relationships and agreements between Indigenous Peoples and researchers, and gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen existing governance of genomic data. Discussion: The results will ultimately guide policy-making and development of new strategies for Indigenous Peoples to enforce oversight in research to promote ethically and culturally appropriate research.
AB - Introduction: Indigenous Peoples are increasingly exerting governance and oversight over genomic research with citizens of their nations, raising questions about how best to enforce research regulation between American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian peoples and researchers. Methods: Using a community-engaged research approach, we conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with Tribal leaders, clinicians, researchers, policy makers, and Tribal research review board members about their perspectives on ethical issues related to genetics research with Indigenous Peoples in the US. Results: We report findings related to (1) considerations for Indigenous governance, (2) institutional relationships upholding sovereignty, (3) expectations for research approvals, and (4) agreements enacting Indigenous governance. Participants described concerns about different ways of exerting oversight, relationships and agreements between Indigenous Peoples and researchers, and gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen existing governance of genomic data. Discussion: The results will ultimately guide policy-making and development of new strategies for Indigenous Peoples to enforce oversight in research to promote ethically and culturally appropriate research.
KW - data governance
KW - ethical research
KW - genomic research
KW - Indigenous
KW - tribal sovereignty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177823975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177823975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/frma.2023.1286948
DO - 10.3389/frma.2023.1286948
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177823975
SN - 2504-0537
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
JF - Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
M1 - 1286948
ER -