TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional reconstitution of the α2-adrenergic receptor with guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins in phospholipid vesicles
AU - Cerione, R. A.
AU - Regan, J. W.
AU - Nakata, H.
AU - Codina, J.
AU - Benovic, J. L.
AU - Gierschik, P.
AU - Somers, R. L.
AU - Spiegel, A. M.
AU - Birnbaumer, L.
AU - Lefkowitz, R. J.
PY - 1986
Y1 - 1986
N2 - We describe the successful reconstitution of functional interactions between an inhibitory adenylate cyclase-coupled receptor and various nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins in phospholipid vesicles. The receptor is the α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) whcih has been partially purified (~500-5000-fold) from human platelet membranes. The nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins include purified preparations of human erythrocyte N(i) and N(s), bovine retinal transducin and the recently discovered bovine brain N(o). Addition of the physiologic ligand, epinephrine, to vesicles containing the α2AR and N(i) results in stimulation of the GTPase activity in N(i). This stimulation of GTPase activity by epinephrine is prevented in the presence of the α-adrenergic antagonist, phentolamine, which indicates that a functional reconstitution of the α2AR and N(i) has been established. The maximum turnover number for the α2AR-mediated epinephrine-stimulated GTPase activity in N(i) is similar to the maximal turnover numbers obtained for the β-adrenergic receptor-mediated isoproterenol-stimulated GTPase activity in N(s) and the rhodopsin-mediated light-stimulated GTPase activity in transducin (0.5-1.5 mol of P(i) released per min per mol of nucleotide regulatory protein). Functional similarities between the α2AR and rhodopsin are observed in their interactions with the various nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins. Thus, both of these receptor proteins are capable of promoting the maximal activation of N(i) and N(o) while being much less effective in promoting the activation of N(s). However, there are differences between the α2AR and rhodopsin in their interactions with transducin. Specifically, while rhodopsin will maximally activate transducin, the α2AR is much less effective in promoting this activation (i.e ~20% as effective as rhodopsin). Overall, these results suggest the following specificities of interaction: for rhodopsin, transducin ≃ N(i) ≃ N(o) >> N(s); while for α2AR, N(i) ≃ N(o) > transducin ≥ N(s).
AB - We describe the successful reconstitution of functional interactions between an inhibitory adenylate cyclase-coupled receptor and various nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins in phospholipid vesicles. The receptor is the α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) whcih has been partially purified (~500-5000-fold) from human platelet membranes. The nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins include purified preparations of human erythrocyte N(i) and N(s), bovine retinal transducin and the recently discovered bovine brain N(o). Addition of the physiologic ligand, epinephrine, to vesicles containing the α2AR and N(i) results in stimulation of the GTPase activity in N(i). This stimulation of GTPase activity by epinephrine is prevented in the presence of the α-adrenergic antagonist, phentolamine, which indicates that a functional reconstitution of the α2AR and N(i) has been established. The maximum turnover number for the α2AR-mediated epinephrine-stimulated GTPase activity in N(i) is similar to the maximal turnover numbers obtained for the β-adrenergic receptor-mediated isoproterenol-stimulated GTPase activity in N(s) and the rhodopsin-mediated light-stimulated GTPase activity in transducin (0.5-1.5 mol of P(i) released per min per mol of nucleotide regulatory protein). Functional similarities between the α2AR and rhodopsin are observed in their interactions with the various nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins. Thus, both of these receptor proteins are capable of promoting the maximal activation of N(i) and N(o) while being much less effective in promoting the activation of N(s). However, there are differences between the α2AR and rhodopsin in their interactions with transducin. Specifically, while rhodopsin will maximally activate transducin, the α2AR is much less effective in promoting this activation (i.e ~20% as effective as rhodopsin). Overall, these results suggest the following specificities of interaction: for rhodopsin, transducin ≃ N(i) ≃ N(o) >> N(s); while for α2AR, N(i) ≃ N(o) > transducin ≥ N(s).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022981031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022981031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 3005307
AN - SCOPUS:0022981031
SN - 0021-9258
VL - 261
SP - 3901
EP - 3909
JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry
JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry
IS - 8
ER -