Abstract
This article calls attention to a problematic binary produced by public debates surrounding gun rights and gun control-namely, that women must choose armed self-protection or no self-protection at all. I argue that both anti- and pro-gun discourses, drawing on and reproducing race and class privileges, use assumptions about women's physical inferiority to further their agendas. I highlight how both sides have used guns as the proxy for self-defense and conclude by calling for a shift in public discourse to focus on the broader question of the right to self-defense rather than the narrower question of gun rights.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 369-377 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Violence Against Women |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- gun control
- gun rights
- self-defense
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law