Frequency dependence of spike timing reliability in cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons

J. M. Fellous, A. R. Houweling, R. H. Modi, R. P.N. Rao, P. H.E. Tiesinga, T. J. Sejnowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Scopus citations


Pyramidal cells and interneurons in rat prefrontal cortical slices exhibit subthreshold oscillations when depolarized by constant current injection. For both types of neurons, the frequencies of these oscillations for current injection just below spike threshold were 2-10 Hz. Above spike threshold, however, the subthreshold oscillations in pyramidal cells remained low, but the frequency of oscillations in interneurons increased up to 50 Hz. To explore the interaction between these intrinsic oscillations and external inputs, the reliability of spiking in these cortical neurons was studied with sinusoidal current injection over a range of frequencies above and below the intrinsic frequency. Conical neurons produced 1:1 phase locking for a limited range of driving frequencies for fixed amplitude. For low-input amplitude, 1:1 phase locking was obtained in the 5- to 10-Hz range. For higher-input amplitudes, pyramidal cells phase-locked in the 5- to 20-Hz range, whereas interneurons phase-locked in the 5- to 50-Hz range. For the amplitudes studied here, spike time reliability was always highest during 1:1 phase-locking, between 5 and 20 Hz for pyramidal cells and between 5 and 50 Hz for interneurons. The observed differences in the intrinsic frequency preference between pyramidal cells and interneurons have implications for rhythmogenesis and information transmission between populations of cortical neurons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1782-1787
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of neurophysiology
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Physiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency dependence of spike timing reliability in cortical pyramidal cells and interneurons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this