Forest Service grazing permittee perceptions of the Endangered Species Act in southeastern Arizona

Julie Lorton Conley, Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez, George B. Ruyle, Mark Brunson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


This study reports the results of a survey of Coronado National Forest grazing permittees about their attitudes regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the management of threatened and endangered (T&E) species on grazing allotments in southeastern Arizona. A majority of respondents perceived negative impacts from ESA implementation. However, the degree of impact remained independent of the number of listed species on allotments and of the potential for restrictions on those allotments. Perceptions of negative impact and attitudes toward T&E species policies were more related to attitudes toward federal regulation. Permittees broadly supported the idea of species conservation and expressed willingness to work with federal agencies but did not perceive the federal agencies as having the same responsiveness to their concerns. A more proactive agency strategy with science-based, focused recovery objectives coupled with economic incentives could improve support for species recovery efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-145
Number of pages10
JournalRangeland Ecology and Management
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2007


  • Attitudes
  • Coronado National Forest
  • Public land grazing
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Forest Service grazing permittee perceptions of the Endangered Species Act in southeastern Arizona'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this