Abstract
This study reports the results of a survey of Coronado National Forest grazing permittees about their attitudes regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the management of threatened and endangered (T&E) species on grazing allotments in southeastern Arizona. A majority of respondents perceived negative impacts from ESA implementation. However, the degree of impact remained independent of the number of listed species on allotments and of the potential for restrictions on those allotments. Perceptions of negative impact and attitudes toward T&E species policies were more related to attitudes toward federal regulation. Permittees broadly supported the idea of species conservation and expressed willingness to work with federal agencies but did not perceive the federal agencies as having the same responsiveness to their concerns. A more proactive agency strategy with science-based, focused recovery objectives coupled with economic incentives could improve support for species recovery efforts.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 136-145 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Rangeland Ecology and Management |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2007 |
Keywords
- Attitudes
- Coronado National Forest
- Public land grazing
- Survey
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law