For want of a champion: why the EU won’t be ready for the next public health crisis

Robert Henry Cox, Paulette Kurzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article argues that the EU response to the COVID-19 crisis follows a pattern much like its response to earlier public health threats. Though each time the EU commits to being prepared for the next cross-border threat to health, as the immediate crisis recedes, so does the momentum to build the necessary administrative capacity, leaving the EU unprepared to take a leadership role when the next public health crisis emerges. The literature on administrative capacity, identifies authority, autonomy, and resources as three crucial dimensions of administrative capacity. An examination of the efforts to build administrative capacity after several recent public health crises (SARS, Avian Flu, MERS and COVID-19) shows that the EU has made only modest progress in granting such capacity to its supranational agency, The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Despite the claims that COVID-19 was a new level of public health threat that demanded supranational action, the EU response again seems to fall back into a familiar pattern of making minor adjustments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-631
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • ECDC
  • EU health
  • administrative capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'For want of a champion: why the EU won’t be ready for the next public health crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this