Follow the science: The European public health community confronts the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

Paulette Kurzer, Darius Ornston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper argues that “following the science” is not always the best strategy. It does so by examining the first phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in three countries: Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden. All three countries possessed highly respected infectious disease agencies with wide stakeholder involvement. Despite this, Danish, Dutch, and Swedish public health agencies underplayed the threat of the COVID-19 virus, discouraged intrusive mitigation measures, and were slow to admit their mistakes. Countries that trusted their national agencies, specifically the Netherlands and Sweden, witnessed higher mortality. By contrast, the Danish government marginalized its epidemiologists and suppressed the spread of the virus. The paper thus demonstrates the limits of trusting national scientific expertise, even when properly embedded within social networks, during periods of heightened uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-118
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Policy Analysis
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2023

Keywords

  • Denmark
  • Sweden
  • expert knowledge
  • pandemic
  • the Netherlands
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Follow the science: The European public health community confronts the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this