TY - JOUR
T1 - fMRI pattern classification using neuroanatomically constrained boosting
AU - Martínez-Ramón, Manel
AU - Koltchinskii, Vladimir
AU - Heileman, Gregory L.
AU - Posse, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
We want to thank H. Jeremy Bockholt and Andrew Mayer (the MIND Institute, UNM, USA) for providing the brain masks and helping us to use them; Daniel Fitzgerald (Wayne State University School of Medicine), Kunxiu Gao, Jing Xu, and Ting Li (the MIND Institute) for expert technical assistance with scanning and data preprocessing; Jason Weston and Gökhan Bakir (Max Plank Institüt) for sharing their machine learning library Spider. This work was supported by NIH Grant NIBIB 1 RO1 EB002618-01, the MIND Institute-Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-99ER62764, and NSF Grant DMS-0304861, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics.
PY - 2006/7/1
Y1 - 2006/7/1
N2 - Pattern classification in functional MRI (fMRI) is a novel methodology to automatically identify differences in distributed neural substrates resulting from cognitive tasks. Reliable pattern classification is challenging due to the high dimensionality of fMRI data, the small number of available data sets, interindividual differences, and dependence on the acquisition methodology. Thus, most previous fMRI classification methods were applied in individual subjects. In this study, we developed a novel approach to improve multiclass classification across groups of subjects, field strengths, and fMRI methods. Spatially normalized activation maps were segmented into functional areas using a neuroanatomical atlas and each map was classified separately using local classifiers. A single multiclass output was applied using a weighted aggregation of the classifier's outputs. An Adaboost technique was applied, modified to find the optimal aggregation of a set of spatially distributed classifiers. This Adaboost combined the region-specific classifiers to achieve improved classification accuracy with respect to conventional techniques. Multiclass classification accuracy was assessed in an fMRI group study with interleaved motor, visual, auditory, and cognitive task design. Data were acquired across 18 subjects at different field strengths (1.5 T, 4 T), with different pulse sequence parameters (voxel size and readout bandwidth). Misclassification rates of the boosted classifier were between 3.5% and 10%, whereas for the single classifier, these were between 15% and 23%, suggesting that the boosted classifier provides a better generalization ability together with better robustness. The high computational speed of boosting classification makes it attractive for real-time fMRI to facilitate online interpretation of dynamically changing activation patterns.
AB - Pattern classification in functional MRI (fMRI) is a novel methodology to automatically identify differences in distributed neural substrates resulting from cognitive tasks. Reliable pattern classification is challenging due to the high dimensionality of fMRI data, the small number of available data sets, interindividual differences, and dependence on the acquisition methodology. Thus, most previous fMRI classification methods were applied in individual subjects. In this study, we developed a novel approach to improve multiclass classification across groups of subjects, field strengths, and fMRI methods. Spatially normalized activation maps were segmented into functional areas using a neuroanatomical atlas and each map was classified separately using local classifiers. A single multiclass output was applied using a weighted aggregation of the classifier's outputs. An Adaboost technique was applied, modified to find the optimal aggregation of a set of spatially distributed classifiers. This Adaboost combined the region-specific classifiers to achieve improved classification accuracy with respect to conventional techniques. Multiclass classification accuracy was assessed in an fMRI group study with interleaved motor, visual, auditory, and cognitive task design. Data were acquired across 18 subjects at different field strengths (1.5 T, 4 T), with different pulse sequence parameters (voxel size and readout bandwidth). Misclassification rates of the boosted classifier were between 3.5% and 10%, whereas for the single classifier, these were between 15% and 23%, suggesting that the boosted classifier provides a better generalization ability together with better robustness. The high computational speed of boosting classification makes it attractive for real-time fMRI to facilitate online interpretation of dynamically changing activation patterns.
KW - Adaboost
KW - Functional magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Pattern classification
KW - Support vector machines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744936017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744936017&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 16529955
AN - SCOPUS:33744936017
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 31
SP - 1129
EP - 1141
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - 3
ER -