Abstract
The New Orleans hurricane disaster of August 2005 amply illustrates the long-standing failure of relating science to effective policies for reducing flood losses. Particularly flawed is the myth that science constitutes a repository of authoritative knowledge that will objectively serve as the basis for effective policies. This flaw derives from presumptions about the nature of science that can be corrected by employing a pragmatic perspective. Science is the continuing search for truth by a dedicated community of practitioners. Its intrinsic fallibilism means it cannot authoritatively justify a particular action. Instead, its continuous activity provides a reliable guide to action.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-168 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Technology in Society |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2007 |
Keywords
- Flood science
- Hurricane Katrina
- New Orleans
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics
- Business and International Management
- Education
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Flood hazard science, policy, and values: A pragmatist stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS