TY - JOUR
T1 - Flat-panel digital mammography system
T2 - Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images
AU - Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman
AU - Karellas, Andrew
AU - Vedantham, Srinivasan
AU - Ved, Hetal
AU - Baker, Stephen P.
AU - D'Orsi, Carl J.
PY - 2002/12
Y1 - 2002/12
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50% and 62.5% threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50% (P < .001) and 62.5% (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50% and 62.5% threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50% (P < .001) and 62.5% (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.
KW - Breast neoplasms, radiography
KW - Breast radiography, comparative studies
KW - Breast radiography, technology
KW - Phantoms
KW - Radiography, digital
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036892552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036892552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2253011736
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2253011736
M3 - Article
C2 - 12461264
AN - SCOPUS:0036892552
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 225
SP - 801
EP - 807
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 3
ER -