TY - JOUR
T1 - Fertility treatment for the transgender community
T2 - a public opinion study
AU - Scout
AU - Goldman, Randi H.
AU - Kaser, Daniel J.
AU - Missmer, Stacey A.
AU - Farland, Leslie V.
AU - Ashby, Rachel K.
AU - Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest E.G. receives royalties from UpToDate, Springer, and BioMed Central and receives research funding from Serono unrelated to this work. R.A. is a consultant for the New England Cryogenic Center. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
Funding information This study was funded by an intramural grant from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. This funding provided monetary support for data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Purpose: The purposes of this study were to evaluate public opinion regarding fertility treatment and gamete cryopreservation for transgender individuals and identify how support varies by demographic characteristics. Methods: This is a cross-sectional web-based survey study completed by a representative sample of 1111 US residents aged 18–75 years. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of support for/opposition to fertility treatments for transgender people by demographic characteristics, adjusting a priori for age, gender, race, and having a biological child. Results: Of 1336 people recruited, 1111 (83.2%) agreed to participate, and 986 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most respondents (76.2%) agreed that “Doctors should be able to help transgender people have biological children.” Atheists/agnostics were more likely to be in support (88.5%) than Christian–Protestants (72.4%; OR = 3.10, CI = 1.37–7.02), as were younger respondents, sexual minorities, those divorced/widowed, Democrats, and non-parents. Respondents who did not know a gay person (10.0%; OR = 0.20, CI = 0.09–0.42) or only knew a gay person without children (41.4%; OR = 0.29, CI = 0.17–0.50) were more often opposed than those who knew a gay parent (48.7%). No differences in gender, geography, education, or income were observed. A smaller majority of respondents supported doctors helping transgender minors preserve gametes before transitioning (60.6%) or helping transgender men carry pregnancies (60.1%). Conclusions: Most respondents who support assisted and third-party reproduction also support such interventions to help transgender people have children.
AB - Purpose: The purposes of this study were to evaluate public opinion regarding fertility treatment and gamete cryopreservation for transgender individuals and identify how support varies by demographic characteristics. Methods: This is a cross-sectional web-based survey study completed by a representative sample of 1111 US residents aged 18–75 years. Logistic regression was used to calculate odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of support for/opposition to fertility treatments for transgender people by demographic characteristics, adjusting a priori for age, gender, race, and having a biological child. Results: Of 1336 people recruited, 1111 (83.2%) agreed to participate, and 986 (88.7%) completed the survey. Most respondents (76.2%) agreed that “Doctors should be able to help transgender people have biological children.” Atheists/agnostics were more likely to be in support (88.5%) than Christian–Protestants (72.4%; OR = 3.10, CI = 1.37–7.02), as were younger respondents, sexual minorities, those divorced/widowed, Democrats, and non-parents. Respondents who did not know a gay person (10.0%; OR = 0.20, CI = 0.09–0.42) or only knew a gay person without children (41.4%; OR = 0.29, CI = 0.17–0.50) were more often opposed than those who knew a gay parent (48.7%). No differences in gender, geography, education, or income were observed. A smaller majority of respondents supported doctors helping transgender minors preserve gametes before transitioning (60.6%) or helping transgender men carry pregnancies (60.1%). Conclusions: Most respondents who support assisted and third-party reproduction also support such interventions to help transgender people have children.
KW - Assisted reproduction
KW - Fertility preservation
KW - Trans health
KW - Transgender
KW - Transitioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029316564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029316564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y
DO - 10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 28900753
AN - SCOPUS:85029316564
VL - 34
SP - 1457
EP - 1467
JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
SN - 1058-0468
IS - 11
ER -