TY - JOUR
T1 - Features of knowledge building in biology
T2 - Understanding undergraduate students’ ideas about molecular mechanisms
AU - Southard, Katelyn
AU - Wince, Tyler
AU - Meddleton, Shanice
AU - Bolger, Molly S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 K. Southard et al.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Research has suggested that teaching and learning in molecular and cellular biology (MCB) is difficult. We used a new lens to understand undergraduate reasoning about molecular mechanisms: the knowledge-integration approach to conceptual change. Knowledge integration is the dynamic process by which learners acquire new ideas, develop connections between ideas, and reorganize and restructure prior knowledge. Semistructured, clinical think-aloud interviews were conducted with introductory and upper-division MCB students. Interviews included a written conceptual assessment, a concept-mapping activity, and an opportunity to explain the biomechanisms of DNA replication, transcription, and translation. Student reasoning patterns were explored through mixed-method analyses. Results suggested that students must sort mechanistic entities into appropriate mental categories that reflect the nature of MCB mechanisms and that conflation between these categories is common. We also showed how connections between molecular mechanisms and their biological roles are part of building an integrated knowledge network as students develop expertise. We observed differences in the nature of connections between ideas related to different forms of reasoning. Finally, we provide a tentative model for MCB knowledge integration and suggest its implications for undergraduate learning.
AB - Research has suggested that teaching and learning in molecular and cellular biology (MCB) is difficult. We used a new lens to understand undergraduate reasoning about molecular mechanisms: the knowledge-integration approach to conceptual change. Knowledge integration is the dynamic process by which learners acquire new ideas, develop connections between ideas, and reorganize and restructure prior knowledge. Semistructured, clinical think-aloud interviews were conducted with introductory and upper-division MCB students. Interviews included a written conceptual assessment, a concept-mapping activity, and an opportunity to explain the biomechanisms of DNA replication, transcription, and translation. Student reasoning patterns were explored through mixed-method analyses. Results suggested that students must sort mechanistic entities into appropriate mental categories that reflect the nature of MCB mechanisms and that conflation between these categories is common. We also showed how connections between molecular mechanisms and their biological roles are part of building an integrated knowledge network as students develop expertise. We observed differences in the nature of connections between ideas related to different forms of reasoning. Finally, we provide a tentative model for MCB knowledge integration and suggest its implications for undergraduate learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959461535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959461535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1187/cbe.15-05-0114
DO - 10.1187/cbe.15-05-0114
M3 - Article
C2 - 26931398
AN - SCOPUS:84959461535
SN - 1931-7913
VL - 15
JO - CBE life sciences education
JF - CBE life sciences education
IS - 1
M1 - ar7
ER -