TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility Assessment of Microalgal Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Technology with Photobioreactor and Solar Collector
AU - Ono, E.
AU - Cuello, J. L.
N1 - Funding Information:
A portion of this work was supported by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy (DOE) of the United States of America.
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - The aim of this study was to develop a feasibility model for microalgal carbon dioxide (CO2) biofixation using photobioreactors equipped with solar collectors, which would evaluate the unit net cost of CO2 mitigation as a function of the target total CO2 mitigation cost, the available solar radiation, and the biological conversion efficiency, among others. The results showed that, to achieve the target CO2 mitigation price of 30 US$ t-1 [CO2] at 40% biological conversion efficiency, the allowable net cost should be less than 2·52 US$ m-2 yr-1 at low-light intensity (average US location), and should be less than 3·24 US$ m-2 yr-1 at high light intensity (sunbelt region). The model made evident the importance of using microalgae with commercially valuable byproducts (e.g. biofuel), especially in achieving the smaller allowable unit net costs corresponding to more stringent CO2 mitigation costs.
AB - The aim of this study was to develop a feasibility model for microalgal carbon dioxide (CO2) biofixation using photobioreactors equipped with solar collectors, which would evaluate the unit net cost of CO2 mitigation as a function of the target total CO2 mitigation cost, the available solar radiation, and the biological conversion efficiency, among others. The results showed that, to achieve the target CO2 mitigation price of 30 US$ t-1 [CO2] at 40% biological conversion efficiency, the allowable net cost should be less than 2·52 US$ m-2 yr-1 at low-light intensity (average US location), and should be less than 3·24 US$ m-2 yr-1 at high light intensity (sunbelt region). The model made evident the importance of using microalgae with commercially valuable byproducts (e.g. biofuel), especially in achieving the smaller allowable unit net costs corresponding to more stringent CO2 mitigation costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751318445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751318445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33751318445
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 95
SP - 597
EP - 606
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
IS - 4
ER -