TY - JOUR
T1 - Farmer Attitudes Toward Cooperative Approaches to Herbicide Resistance Management
T2 - A Common Pool Ecosystem Service Challenge
AU - Ervin, David E.
AU - Breshears, Elise H.
AU - Frisvold, George B.
AU - Hurley, Terrance
AU - Dentzman, Katherine E.
AU - Gunsolus, Jeffrey L.
AU - Jussaume, Raymond A.
AU - Owen, Micheal D.K.
AU - Norsworthy, Jason K.
AU - Al Mamun, Mustofa Mahmud
AU - Everman, Wesley
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Dramatic growth in herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds in the United States threatens farm profitability and may undercut environmentally beneficial farming practices. When HR weeds move across farm boundaries due to ecological processes or human action, a common pool resource challenge emerges, requiring farmer cooperation to manage such weeds effectively. We investigate the scope for cooperative management using responses to a national survey on HR weed issues to test a recursive model of three preconditions for collective action: (1) concern about HR weeds migrating from nearby lands; (2) communication with neighbors about HR weeds; and (3) belief that cooperation is necessary for effective resistance management. Results suggest that farmers who relied more on Extension educators regarding weed management, were more likely to satisfy each precondition. Further, concern about weeds resistant to multiple herbicides as well as concern about HR weed mobility positively influence concern about migration and views toward cooperation. Farmer time constraints and “techno-optimism” (a belief that herbicide discoveries will solve resistance problems) detract from the perceived need for cooperative approaches. A different set of factors significantly affect each precondition, suggesting heterogeneity in the underlying casual mechanisms. The findings can help tailor collective action to different socio-ecological settings experiencing HR weed resistance issues.
AB - Dramatic growth in herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds in the United States threatens farm profitability and may undercut environmentally beneficial farming practices. When HR weeds move across farm boundaries due to ecological processes or human action, a common pool resource challenge emerges, requiring farmer cooperation to manage such weeds effectively. We investigate the scope for cooperative management using responses to a national survey on HR weed issues to test a recursive model of three preconditions for collective action: (1) concern about HR weeds migrating from nearby lands; (2) communication with neighbors about HR weeds; and (3) belief that cooperation is necessary for effective resistance management. Results suggest that farmers who relied more on Extension educators regarding weed management, were more likely to satisfy each precondition. Further, concern about weeds resistant to multiple herbicides as well as concern about HR weed mobility positively influence concern about migration and views toward cooperation. Farmer time constraints and “techno-optimism” (a belief that herbicide discoveries will solve resistance problems) detract from the perceived need for cooperative approaches. A different set of factors significantly affect each precondition, suggesting heterogeneity in the underlying casual mechanisms. The findings can help tailor collective action to different socio-ecological settings experiencing HR weed resistance issues.
KW - Common pool resources
KW - Cooperation
KW - Extension
KW - Herbicide resistance
KW - Techno-optimism
KW - Time constraints
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057776161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057776161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057776161
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 157
SP - 237
EP - 245
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -