Factors in the selection of a teleradiology provider in the United States

Tim B. Hunter, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Ronald S. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Commercial teleradiology is well established in the US. There are many factors to consider when engaging a teleradiology provider. One of the basic questions is what do you expect to gain from it? Do you want a final reading from an attending radiologist (known as a consultant radiologist in many countries) or would you be satisfied with a preliminary reading from a teleradiology provider and a final reading from your own in-house radiologist the following day? Do you simply require after-hours coverage or do you need to supplement the coverage provided by your own internal radiologists during normal working hours? Teleradiology is not without its drawbacks. It can add additional costs, particularly for after-hours coverage. Teleradiology rarely provides in-house coverage for procedures, and the interpreting radiologist may sometimes be difficult to contact for consultation. Choosing a teleradiology vendor requires due diligence. When the contracting entity defines its expectations well and chooses its teleradiology vendor with care, the end result will be satisfactory for all concerned, including the patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-359
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of telemedicine and telecare
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics


Dive into the research topics of 'Factors in the selection of a teleradiology provider in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this