TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Associated with Recurrence of Amblyopia on Cessation of Patching
AU - Holmes, Jonathan M.
AU - Melia, Michele
AU - Bradfield, Yasmin S.
AU - Cruz, Oscar A.
AU - Forbes, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (grant nos. EY011751 [cooperative agreement from the National Eye Institute], EY015799 [JMH]), and unrestricted grants from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc., New York, New York (Depts. of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine [JMH] and Saint Louis University [OAC]).
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - Purpose: In a prospective observational study, we previously reported that weaning (tapering or gradually reducing) treatment in children treated with 6 to 8 hours of daily patching for amblyopia resulted in a 4-fold reduction in odds of recurrence. We now report the association of additional factors with recurrence or regression of amblyopia in this same cohort. Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Participants: Sixty-nine children aged <8 years with successfully treated anisometropic or strabismic amblyopia (improved ≥3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] lines). Methods: Patients were enrolled at the time they stopped patching for amblyopia. Patients were classified according to whether patching was stopped abruptly or weaned before cessation. They were followed off treatment for 52 weeks to assess recurrence of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measure: Recurrence of amblyopia defined as a ≥2-logMAR level reduction of visual acuity from enrollment (cessation of patching) confirmed by a second examination. Recurrence was also considered to have occurred if treatment was restarted with a ≥2-logMAR level reduction of visual acuity, even if it was not confirmed by a second examination. Results: The risk of recurrence was higher with better visual acuity at the time of cessation of treatment (adjusted risk ratio [RR], 0.68 per line of worse visual acuity; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.90), a greater number of lines improved during the previous treatment (adjusted RR, 1.5 per line increase; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and a history of recurrence (adjusted RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.9). Orthotropia or excellent stereoacuity at the time of patching cessation did not appear to have a protective effect on the risk of recurrence. Conclusions: The higher risk of recurrence in the most successfully treated children with amblyopia and absence of protection from orthotropia and excellent random dot stereoacuity suggests that careful and prolonged follow-up is needed for all children who have been previously treated for amblyopia.
AB - Purpose: In a prospective observational study, we previously reported that weaning (tapering or gradually reducing) treatment in children treated with 6 to 8 hours of daily patching for amblyopia resulted in a 4-fold reduction in odds of recurrence. We now report the association of additional factors with recurrence or regression of amblyopia in this same cohort. Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Participants: Sixty-nine children aged <8 years with successfully treated anisometropic or strabismic amblyopia (improved ≥3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] lines). Methods: Patients were enrolled at the time they stopped patching for amblyopia. Patients were classified according to whether patching was stopped abruptly or weaned before cessation. They were followed off treatment for 52 weeks to assess recurrence of amblyopia. Main Outcome Measure: Recurrence of amblyopia defined as a ≥2-logMAR level reduction of visual acuity from enrollment (cessation of patching) confirmed by a second examination. Recurrence was also considered to have occurred if treatment was restarted with a ≥2-logMAR level reduction of visual acuity, even if it was not confirmed by a second examination. Results: The risk of recurrence was higher with better visual acuity at the time of cessation of treatment (adjusted risk ratio [RR], 0.68 per line of worse visual acuity; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.90), a greater number of lines improved during the previous treatment (adjusted RR, 1.5 per line increase; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), and a history of recurrence (adjusted RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.9). Orthotropia or excellent stereoacuity at the time of patching cessation did not appear to have a protective effect on the risk of recurrence. Conclusions: The higher risk of recurrence in the most successfully treated children with amblyopia and absence of protection from orthotropia and excellent random dot stereoacuity suggests that careful and prolonged follow-up is needed for all children who have been previously treated for amblyopia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547171613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547171613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 17363058
AN - SCOPUS:34547171613
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 114
SP - 1427
EP - 1432
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 8
ER -