TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert perspectives on exposure-response functions for urban health policy
T2 - Lessons from a UBDPolicy workshop
AU - Williams, Harry
AU - Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic
AU - Boogaard, Hanna
AU - Brage, Søren
AU - Browning, Matthew H.E.M.
AU - Cai, Samuel
AU - Chen, Xuan
AU - deSouza, Priyanka
AU - Dzhambov, Angel M.
AU - Fenech, Benjamin
AU - Flower, Gillian
AU - Forastiere, Francesco
AU - Garcia, Leandro
AU - Gasparrini, Antonio
AU - Gehring, Ulrike
AU - Gowers, Alison M.
AU - Hoek, Gerard
AU - Khomenko, Sasha
AU - Lim, Chris C.
AU - Lu, Chenxi
AU - Mitsakou, Christina
AU - Pozzer, Andrea
AU - Ramani, Tara
AU - Roscoe, Charlotte
AU - Spadaro, Joseph V.
AU - Tatah, Lambed
AU - Vienneau, Danielle
AU - Woodcock, James
AU - Yeager, Ray
AU - Zapata-Diomedi, Belen
AU - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark
AU - Khreis, Haneen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Policy-makers require robust, quantitative evidence in order to better align urban and transport planning practices with public health goals. Epidemiologically derived exposure-response functions can quantify the association between urban health determinants and human health outcomes. They are therefore a crucial input in quantitative health risk assessments, providing to policy-makers actionable evidence on how healthier, more sustainable cities may be achieved. The Urban Burden of Disease Policy (UBDPolicy) project convened a two-day workshop to discuss recent developments, ongoing challenges, and future directions for exposure-response functions and their application to quantitative health risk assessment. The workshop discussions centred around air pollution, transport noise, non-optimal temperature, greenspace and physical activity as primary pathways through which urban and transport planning impact human health. Based on this workshop, we provide an expert-guided perspective on how to enhance both our conceptual understanding of exposure-response functions and their practical application in urban health risk assessment. We also identify pathway-specific as well as cross-cutting (e.g., quantifying multiple exposures, need for population sub-group evidence) research needs relevant to environmental health more broadly. We propose several future research directions as an agenda for advancing urban environmental health.
AB - Policy-makers require robust, quantitative evidence in order to better align urban and transport planning practices with public health goals. Epidemiologically derived exposure-response functions can quantify the association between urban health determinants and human health outcomes. They are therefore a crucial input in quantitative health risk assessments, providing to policy-makers actionable evidence on how healthier, more sustainable cities may be achieved. The Urban Burden of Disease Policy (UBDPolicy) project convened a two-day workshop to discuss recent developments, ongoing challenges, and future directions for exposure-response functions and their application to quantitative health risk assessment. The workshop discussions centred around air pollution, transport noise, non-optimal temperature, greenspace and physical activity as primary pathways through which urban and transport planning impact human health. Based on this workshop, we provide an expert-guided perspective on how to enhance both our conceptual understanding of exposure-response functions and their practical application in urban health risk assessment. We also identify pathway-specific as well as cross-cutting (e.g., quantifying multiple exposures, need for population sub-group evidence) research needs relevant to environmental health more broadly. We propose several future research directions as an agenda for advancing urban environmental health.
KW - Air pollution
KW - Exposure-response functions
KW - Greenspace
KW - Health impact assessment
KW - Non-optimal temperature
KW - Physical activity
KW - Transport noise
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020260472
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020260472#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2025.123150
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2025.123150
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41130511
AN - SCOPUS:105020260472
SN - 0013-9351
VL - 288
JO - Environmental Research
JF - Environmental Research
M1 - 123150
ER -