Expert perspectives on exposure-response functions for urban health policy: Lessons from a UBDPolicy workshop

  • Harry Williams
  • , Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
  • , Hanna Boogaard
  • , Søren Brage
  • , Matthew H.E.M. Browning
  • , Samuel Cai
  • , Xuan Chen
  • , Priyanka deSouza
  • , Angel M. Dzhambov
  • , Benjamin Fenech
  • , Gillian Flower
  • , Francesco Forastiere
  • , Leandro Garcia
  • , Antonio Gasparrini
  • , Ulrike Gehring
  • , Alison M. Gowers
  • , Gerard Hoek
  • , Sasha Khomenko
  • , Chris C. Lim
  • , Chenxi Lu
  • Christina Mitsakou, Andrea Pozzer, Tara Ramani, Charlotte Roscoe, Joseph V. Spadaro, Lambed Tatah, Danielle Vienneau, James Woodcock, Ray Yeager, Belen Zapata-Diomedi, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Haneen Khreis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Policy-makers require robust, quantitative evidence in order to better align urban and transport planning practices with public health goals. Epidemiologically derived exposure-response functions can quantify the association between urban health determinants and human health outcomes. They are therefore a crucial input in quantitative health risk assessments, providing to policy-makers actionable evidence on how healthier, more sustainable cities may be achieved. The Urban Burden of Disease Policy (UBDPolicy) project convened a two-day workshop to discuss recent developments, ongoing challenges, and future directions for exposure-response functions and their application to quantitative health risk assessment. The workshop discussions centred around air pollution, transport noise, non-optimal temperature, greenspace and physical activity as primary pathways through which urban and transport planning impact human health. Based on this workshop, we provide an expert-guided perspective on how to enhance both our conceptual understanding of exposure-response functions and their practical application in urban health risk assessment. We also identify pathway-specific as well as cross-cutting (e.g., quantifying multiple exposures, need for population sub-group evidence) research needs relevant to environmental health more broadly. We propose several future research directions as an agenda for advancing urban environmental health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number123150
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume288
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Exposure-response functions
  • Greenspace
  • Health impact assessment
  • Non-optimal temperature
  • Physical activity
  • Transport noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • General Environmental Science
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expert perspectives on exposure-response functions for urban health policy: Lessons from a UBDPolicy workshop'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this