TY - JOUR
T1 - Existence, Distribution, and Characteristics of STD Clinics in the United States, 2017
AU - Meyerson, Beth E.
AU - Davis, Alissa
AU - Reno, Hilary
AU - Haderxhanaj, Laura T.
AU - Sayegh, M. Aaron
AU - Simmons, Megan K.
AU - Multani, Gurprit
AU - Naeyaert, Lindsey
AU - Meador, Audra
AU - Stoner, Bradley P.
N1 - Funding Information:
A national listing of clinics is available by contacting the corresponding author. The list should be publicly available by autumn 2019 through the Indiana University Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention. The authors declared no funding with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Objectives: Studies of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics have been limited by the lack of a national list for representative sampling. We sought to establish the number, type, and distribution of STD clinics and describe selected community characteristics associated with them. Methods: We conducted a 2-phased, multilevel, online search from September 2014 through March 2015 and from May through October 2017 to identify STD clinics in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. We obtained data on clinic name, address, contact information, and 340B funding status (which requires manufacturers to provide outpatient drugs at reduced prices). We classified clinics by type. We also obtained secondary county-level data to compare rates of chlamydia and HIV, teen births, uninsurance and unemployment, and high school graduation; ratios of primary care physician to population; health care costs; median household income; and percentage of population living in rural areas vs nonrural areas. We used t tests to examine mean differences in characteristics between counties with and without STD clinics. Results: We found 4079 STD clinics and classified them into 10 types; 2530 (62.0%) clinics were affiliated with a local health department. Of 3129 counties, 1098 (35.1%) did not have an STD clinic. Twelve states had an STD clinic in every county, and 34 states had ≥1 clinic per 100 000 population. Most STD clinics were located in areas of high chlamydia morbidity and where other surrogate needs were greatest; rural areas were underserved by STD clinics. Conclusions: This list may aid in more comprehensive national studies of clinic services, STD clinic adaptation to external policy changes (eg, in public financing or patient access policy), and long-term clinic survival, with special attention to clinic coverage in rural areas.
AB - Objectives: Studies of sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics have been limited by the lack of a national list for representative sampling. We sought to establish the number, type, and distribution of STD clinics and describe selected community characteristics associated with them. Methods: We conducted a 2-phased, multilevel, online search from September 2014 through March 2015 and from May through October 2017 to identify STD clinics in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. We obtained data on clinic name, address, contact information, and 340B funding status (which requires manufacturers to provide outpatient drugs at reduced prices). We classified clinics by type. We also obtained secondary county-level data to compare rates of chlamydia and HIV, teen births, uninsurance and unemployment, and high school graduation; ratios of primary care physician to population; health care costs; median household income; and percentage of population living in rural areas vs nonrural areas. We used t tests to examine mean differences in characteristics between counties with and without STD clinics. Results: We found 4079 STD clinics and classified them into 10 types; 2530 (62.0%) clinics were affiliated with a local health department. Of 3129 counties, 1098 (35.1%) did not have an STD clinic. Twelve states had an STD clinic in every county, and 34 states had ≥1 clinic per 100 000 population. Most STD clinics were located in areas of high chlamydia morbidity and where other surrogate needs were greatest; rural areas were underserved by STD clinics. Conclusions: This list may aid in more comprehensive national studies of clinic services, STD clinic adaptation to external policy changes (eg, in public financing or patient access policy), and long-term clinic survival, with special attention to clinic coverage in rural areas.
KW - STD clinics
KW - health services research
KW - safety-net health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068887138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068887138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0033354919847733
DO - 10.1177/0033354919847733
M3 - Article
C2 - 31112071
AN - SCOPUS:85068887138
SN - 0033-3549
VL - 134
SP - 371
EP - 378
JO - Public Health Reports
JF - Public Health Reports
IS - 4
ER -