Abstract
In this study we trouble the notion of “grit” and “high-stakes” testing by focusing on the experiences and perspectives of Black and Latinx students labeled with dis/abilities with the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE). Through interviews, focus groups, and classroom observations with 15 Black and Latinx students labeled with dis/abilities, we utilize the power of student voice and counterstories to problematize the master narrative of a “grit”/no “grit” binary in education policy discourse. This binary has contributed to an educational culture that reinforces victim blaming, reifies inequities for Black and Latinx students with dis/abilities, and undermines students’ emotional wellbeing. Harnessing the power of the students’ experiences and perspectives, we conclude with recommendations for policy and practice.
Translated title of the contribution | Troubling the master narrative of “grit”: Counterstories of black and latinx students with dis/abilities during an era of “high-stakes” testing |
---|---|
Original language | Spanish |
Article number | 1 |
Journal | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Volume | 27 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Disability Studies in education
- Grit
- High-stakes testing
- Students of color with dis/abilities
- Urban schooling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education