TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for Terror Management Theory II
T2 - The Effects of Mortality Salience on Reactions to Those Who Threaten or Bolster the Cultural Worldview
AU - Greenberg, Jeff
AU - Pyszczynski, Tom
AU - Solomon, Sheldon
AU - Rosenblatt, Abram
AU - Veeder, Mitchell
AU - Kirkland, Shari
AU - Lyon, Deborah
PY - 1990/2
Y1 - 1990/2
N2 - Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis, derived from terror management theory, that reminding people of their mortality increases attraction to those who consensually validate their beliefs and decreases attraction to those who threaten their beliefs. In Study 1, subjects with a Christian religious background were asked to form impressions of Christian and Jewish target persons. Before doing so, mortality was made salient to half of the subjects. In support of predictions, mortality salience led to more positive evaluations of the in-group member (the Christian) and more negative evaluations of the out-group member (the Jew). In Study 2, mortality salience led to especially negative evaluations of an attitudinally dissimilar other, but only among subjects high in authoritarianism. In Study 3, mortality salience led to especially positive reactions to someone who directly praised subjects' cultural worldviews and especially negative reactions to someone who criticized them. The implications of these findings for understanding in-group favoritism, prejudice, and intolerance of deviance are discussed.
AB - Three experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis, derived from terror management theory, that reminding people of their mortality increases attraction to those who consensually validate their beliefs and decreases attraction to those who threaten their beliefs. In Study 1, subjects with a Christian religious background were asked to form impressions of Christian and Jewish target persons. Before doing so, mortality was made salient to half of the subjects. In support of predictions, mortality salience led to more positive evaluations of the in-group member (the Christian) and more negative evaluations of the out-group member (the Jew). In Study 2, mortality salience led to especially negative evaluations of an attitudinally dissimilar other, but only among subjects high in authoritarianism. In Study 3, mortality salience led to especially positive reactions to someone who directly praised subjects' cultural worldviews and especially negative reactions to someone who criticized them. The implications of these findings for understanding in-group favoritism, prejudice, and intolerance of deviance are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010652744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0010652744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0010652744
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 58
SP - 308
EP - 318
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 2
ER -