Abstract
Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel surgical option for the treatment of achalasia. Most centers perform a routine esophagram on postoperative day (POD) #1 to rule esophageal perforation and leaks. In this study, we sought to determine the clinical utility of routine contrast studies post-POEM. Methods: POEM was performed using an anterior submucosal tunnel and selective myotomy of the circular muscle layer. A routine contrast esophagram was obtained on POD #1. We conducted a retrospective review of the radiologists’ interpretations of these studies and compared them to patient’s clinical course. Results: Seventy-eight patients were included. Among these, two complications occurred. One patient was non-compliant with postoperative nil per os orders and developed epigastric pain suspicious for a leak that was demonstrated on esophagram. Another patient had subcutaneous emphysema on POD #1 esophagram, a finding that was also present on physical examination, without esophageal leakage. Another esophagram in an asymptomatic patient was suspicious for submucosal tunnel hematoma which prompted a return to the operating room with negative results. Overall, 56 patients had abnormal studies. POD #1 esophagram demonstrated a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 45 % in identifying clinically significant complications. Conclusions: In this series, we found routine esophagram to have a high sensitivity but a very low specificity in detecting clinically significant complications. Routine esophagram after POEM may not be necessary.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2969-2974 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Surgical endoscopy |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Achalasia
- Esophageal leak
- Esophageal physiology
- Esophagram
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy
- Postoperative complications
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery