TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of off-the-shelf displays for use in the american board of radiology maintenance of certification examination
AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
AU - Becker, Gary J.
AU - Laszakovits, David
AU - Gerdeman, Anthony M.
AU - Evanoff, Michael G.
PY - 2009/3
Y1 - 2009/3
N2 - Purpose: To prospectively compare high-, mid-, and low-resolution off-the-shelf displays currently employed by commercial testing centers, in terms of visibility of lesion features needed to render a diagnostic decision when possible diagnoses are provided in a multiple-choice format during a maintenance of certification (MOC) examination. Materials and Methods:The Psychometrics Division of the American Board of Radiology (ABR) approved the studies (human subjects and HIPAA compliant). One study compared 1280 × 1024 displays with 1024 × 768 displays; the second, 1600 × 1200 with 1280 × 1024 displays. Images from nine subspe- cialties were used. In each study, observers viewed images twice-once on each display. Diagnoses were provided, and observers rated visibility of diagnostic features. Results: Of 7977 data pairs analyzed in study 1, the 1024 and 1280 displays received the same ratings for 5726 data pairs (72% of the time), with the 1024 display receiving a higher rating for 679 data pairs (9% of the time) and the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 1572 data pairs (19% of the time) (P <.0001). When rating differences existed, all subspecialties except nuclear medicine had significantly more high-visibility ratings with the 1280 display. Of 1090 data pairs analyzed in study 2, the 1280 and 1600 displays received the same ratings for 689 data pairs (63% of the time), with the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 162 data pairs (15% of the time) and the 1600 receiving a higher rating for 239 data pairs (22% of the time) (P =.0001). When rating differences existed, only cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal images had significantly more high- visibility ratings with the 1600 display. Conclusion: For the ABR MOC examinations, 1280 × 1024 displays should be used, compared to 1024 × 768 displays; 1600 × 1200 displays may be necessary for some images. Good- quality images must be used on the examinations, so digital rather than digitized film images should be used to ensure high-quality images.
AB - Purpose: To prospectively compare high-, mid-, and low-resolution off-the-shelf displays currently employed by commercial testing centers, in terms of visibility of lesion features needed to render a diagnostic decision when possible diagnoses are provided in a multiple-choice format during a maintenance of certification (MOC) examination. Materials and Methods:The Psychometrics Division of the American Board of Radiology (ABR) approved the studies (human subjects and HIPAA compliant). One study compared 1280 × 1024 displays with 1024 × 768 displays; the second, 1600 × 1200 with 1280 × 1024 displays. Images from nine subspe- cialties were used. In each study, observers viewed images twice-once on each display. Diagnoses were provided, and observers rated visibility of diagnostic features. Results: Of 7977 data pairs analyzed in study 1, the 1024 and 1280 displays received the same ratings for 5726 data pairs (72% of the time), with the 1024 display receiving a higher rating for 679 data pairs (9% of the time) and the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 1572 data pairs (19% of the time) (P <.0001). When rating differences existed, all subspecialties except nuclear medicine had significantly more high-visibility ratings with the 1280 display. Of 1090 data pairs analyzed in study 2, the 1280 and 1600 displays received the same ratings for 689 data pairs (63% of the time), with the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 162 data pairs (15% of the time) and the 1600 receiving a higher rating for 239 data pairs (22% of the time) (P =.0001). When rating differences existed, only cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal images had significantly more high- visibility ratings with the 1600 display. Conclusion: For the ABR MOC examinations, 1280 × 1024 displays should be used, compared to 1024 × 768 displays; 1600 × 1200 displays may be necessary for some images. Good- quality images must be used on the examinations, so digital rather than digitized film images should be used to ensure high-quality images.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649090786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649090786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2503080596
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2503080596
M3 - Article
C2 - 19164117
AN - SCOPUS:62649090786
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 250
SP - 658
EP - 664
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 3
ER -