TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating values in creative placemaking
T2 - The arts as community development in the NEA’s Our Town program
AU - Crisman, Jonathan Jae an
N1 - Funding Information:
The author would like to thank the guest editors of this special issue and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback, as well as Maria Rosario Jackson for her generous insight into creative placemaking.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Urban Affairs Association.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Arts-based community development practices have received newfound prominence over the past decade under the auspices of “creative placemaking.” In 2010, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) published a white paper titled “Creative Placemaking” and launched a new granting program focused on this practice called Our Town. Today, creative placemaking is burgeoning yet its precise definition remains fuzzy. This article uses content analysis to systematically analyze the 569 Our Town grants awarded by the NEA since the program’s inception to inductively define creative placemaking based on the values embedded into project proposals, comparing these values with the NEA’s stated Our Town goals. I find that creative placemaking, at least as funded in the U.S. through Our Town, can be defined as public or community-based art that includes values of place-specificity, collaboration, and participation, and which results in three forms of community development outcomes: economic development, bolstering social capital and participation, and improved cultural infrastructure. As creative placemaking evolves, equity is increasingly a concern, shifting focus toward the latter two outcomes as more measurable and desirable.
AB - Arts-based community development practices have received newfound prominence over the past decade under the auspices of “creative placemaking.” In 2010, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) published a white paper titled “Creative Placemaking” and launched a new granting program focused on this practice called Our Town. Today, creative placemaking is burgeoning yet its precise definition remains fuzzy. This article uses content analysis to systematically analyze the 569 Our Town grants awarded by the NEA since the program’s inception to inductively define creative placemaking based on the values embedded into project proposals, comparing these values with the NEA’s stated Our Town goals. I find that creative placemaking, at least as funded in the U.S. through Our Town, can be defined as public or community-based art that includes values of place-specificity, collaboration, and participation, and which results in three forms of community development outcomes: economic development, bolstering social capital and participation, and improved cultural infrastructure. As creative placemaking evolves, equity is increasingly a concern, shifting focus toward the latter two outcomes as more measurable and desirable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102929050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102929050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07352166.2021.1890607
DO - 10.1080/07352166.2021.1890607
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102929050
SN - 0735-2166
VL - 44
SP - 708
EP - 726
JO - Journal of Urban Affairs
JF - Journal of Urban Affairs
IS - 4-5
ER -