TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethically Responsible Participant Selection in Research
T2 - A Viewpoint
AU - Irizarry-Pérez, Carlos D.
AU - Fabiano, Leah
AU - Martinez-Fisher, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Purpose: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the profession of speech and hearing sciences. However, there exist significant discrepancies between the demographics of our members and the populations served. These discrepancies extend to the participants included within our research publica-tions. This article addresses participant selection when conducting research investigations. First, we draw attention to standards of conduct that are present within and outside the field. Second, we highlight inequities that exist. We explore a case study as an example. Finally, we offer suggestions to help rectify the problem. Conclusions: Inequities at the level of participants’ selection result in discrepant access to clinical services and evidence-based research for multilingual individ-uals; neurodiverse individuals; and Black, Indigenous, and people of color com-munities. ASHA and researchers alike can show commitment to DEI by addressing this problem from multiple approaches.
AB - Purpose: The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the profession of speech and hearing sciences. However, there exist significant discrepancies between the demographics of our members and the populations served. These discrepancies extend to the participants included within our research publica-tions. This article addresses participant selection when conducting research investigations. First, we draw attention to standards of conduct that are present within and outside the field. Second, we highlight inequities that exist. We explore a case study as an example. Finally, we offer suggestions to help rectify the problem. Conclusions: Inequities at the level of participants’ selection result in discrepant access to clinical services and evidence-based research for multilingual individ-uals; neurodiverse individuals; and Black, Indigenous, and people of color com-munities. ASHA and researchers alike can show commitment to DEI by addressing this problem from multiple approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190399293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190399293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00567
DO - 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00567
M3 - Article
C2 - 38407070
AN - SCOPUS:85190399293
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 67
SP - 1136
EP - 1142
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 4
ER -