TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record
T2 - In the Service of the Patient
AU - American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee
AU - Sulmasy, Lois Snyder
AU - López, Ana María
AU - Horwitch, Carrie A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.
AB - Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015616318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015616318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1
DO - 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 28321550
AN - SCOPUS:85015616318
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 32
SP - 935
EP - 939
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 8
ER -