Abstract
Paper 2 of this three‐part series uses synthetic data to investigate the properties of the adjoint state maximum likelihood cross‐validation (ASMLCV) method presented in paper 1 (Samper and Neuman, this issue (a)). More than 40 synthetic experiments are performed to compare various conjugate gradient algorithms; investigate the manner in which computer time varies with ASMLCV parameters; study the effect of sample size and choice of kriging points on ASMLCV estimates ; evaluate the ability of various model structure identification criteria to help select the most appropriate semivariogram model among given alternatives; study the conditions required for parameter identifiability, uniqueness, and stability; quantify the statistics of cross‐validation errors; test hypotheses concerning the distribution and autocorrelation of these errors; and illustrate the computation of approximate quality indicators for ASMLCV parameter estimates.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 363-371 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Water Resources Research |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Water Science and Technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of spatial covariance structures by adjoint state maximum likelihood cross validation: 2. Synthetic experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS