Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Er:YAG laser vs. sharp debridement in management of chronic wounds: Effects on pain and bacterial load

  • Babak Hajhosseini
  • , Grace J. Chiou
  • , Gretchen Dori
  • , Eri Fukaya
  • , Venita Chandra
  • , Shannon Meyer
  • , Geoffrey C. Gurtner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Chronic wounds affect roughly 6.5 million patients in the US annually. Current standard of therapy entails weekly sharp debridement. However, the sharp technique is associated with significant pain, while having minimal impact on the bioburden. Our study proposes the Er:YAG laser as an alternative method of debridement that may decrease procedural pain, reduce bioburden, and potentially improve overall healing. This pilot study was performed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial, containing two groups: (1) one group underwent single laser debridement session first, followed by single sharp debridement session one week later; and (2) the other group underwent single sharp debridement session first, followed by single laser debridement session one week later. Variables analyzed included pain during debridement, pre- and post-debridement wound sizes, pre- and post-debridement bacterial loads and patient preference. Twenty-two patients were enrolled (12 patients in Group 1, plus 10 patients in Group 2). The mean pain score for patients undergoing laser debridement was 3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 4.8 ± 2.6 for those undergoing sharp debridement (p = 0.003). The mean percent change in wound size 1-week post-laser debridement was −20.8% ± 80.1%, as compared with −36.7% ± 54.3% 1-week post-sharp debridement (p = 0.6). The percentage of patients who had a bacterial load in the low/negative category increased from 27.3% to 59.1% immediately after laser debridement (p = 0.04), vs. 54.5% to 68.2% immediately after sharp debridement (p = 0.38). Moreover, there was a sustained decrease in bacterial load 1-week post-laser debridement, as compared with no sustained decrease 1-week post-sharp debridement (p < 0.02). Overall, 52.9% of patients preferred laser debridement vs. 35.3% for sharp debridement. We believe that Er:YAG laser serves as a promising technology in chronic wounds, functioning as a potentially superior alternative to sharp debridement, the current standard of therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-125
Number of pages8
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Er:YAG laser vs. sharp debridement in management of chronic wounds: Effects on pain and bacterial load'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this