Abstract
On page 16 of the published article, the sentence that begins as, We indeed detect such emission, particularly in the early-time MMT spectrumK, is written incorrectly and would be misleading to a reader. The actual Hα luminosity, LHα, that we estimated from the observed line flux in the spectrum is ∼9.2×1037 to 3.4 ×1038 erg s-1. The "6.7 × 1049 to 2.5 × 1050" written in that passage of the published article is actually referring to the number of Lyman continuum photons, NLyC. This is purely a typographical error. Again, following Martins et al. (2005), NLyC is still equivalent to 1-4 O3 I stars or 4-15 O5 V stars. We stress that the end result of that calculation and discussion are totally unaffected. Additionally, in Sections 2.3 and 4.1 and in Figure 8, we refer to the pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 images as being from 2006 October 20, whereas these data are from 2007 December 11. Again, this is a typographical error and has absolutely no effect on the detection and characterization of the supernova progenitor candidate. The overall conclusions of the paper remain entirely unchanged.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 77 |
| Journal | Astrophysical Journal |
| Volume | 868 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Nov 20 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: SN 2017ein and the possible first identification of a type IC supernova progenitor (The Astrophysical Journal (2018) 860: 90 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042386)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS