Erratum: SN 2017ein and the possible first identification of a type IC supernova progenitor (The Astrophysical Journal (2018) 860: 90 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042386)

Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Weikang Zheng, Thomas G. Brink, Alexei V. Filippenko, Dan Milisavljevic, Jennifer E. Andrews, Nathan Smith, Michele Cignoni, Ori D. Fox, Patrick L. Kelly, Angela Adamo, Sameen Yunus, Keto Zhang, Sahana Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

On page 16 of the published article, the sentence that begins as, We indeed detect such emission, particularly in the early-time MMT spectrumK, is written incorrectly and would be misleading to a reader. The actual Hα luminosity, LHα, that we estimated from the observed line flux in the spectrum is ∼9.2×1037 to 3.4 ×1038 erg s-1. The "6.7 × 1049 to 2.5 × 1050" written in that passage of the published article is actually referring to the number of Lyman continuum photons, NLyC. This is purely a typographical error. Again, following Martins et al. (2005), NLyC is still equivalent to 1-4 O3 I stars or 4-15 O5 V stars. We stress that the end result of that calculation and discussion are totally unaffected. Additionally, in Sections 2.3 and 4.1 and in Figure 8, we refer to the pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 images as being from 2006 October 20, whereas these data are from 2007 December 11. Again, this is a typographical error and has absolutely no effect on the detection and characterization of the supernova progenitor candidate. The overall conclusions of the paper remain entirely unchanged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number77
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume868
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: SN 2017ein and the possible first identification of a type IC supernova progenitor (The Astrophysical Journal (2018) 860: 90 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042386)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this