TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - SN 2017ein and the possible first identification of a type IC supernova progenitor (The Astrophysical Journal (2018) 860: 90 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042386)
AU - Van Dyk, Schuyler D.
AU - Zheng, Weikang
AU - Brink, Thomas G.
AU - Filippenko, Alexei V.
AU - Milisavljevic, Dan
AU - Andrews, Jennifer E.
AU - Smith, Nathan
AU - Cignoni, Michele
AU - Fox, Ori D.
AU - Kelly, Patrick L.
AU - Adamo, Angela
AU - Yunus, Sameen
AU - Zhang, Keto
AU - Kumar, Sahana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/11/20
Y1 - 2018/11/20
N2 - On page 16 of the published article, the sentence that begins as, We indeed detect such emission, particularly in the early-time MMT spectrumK, is written incorrectly and would be misleading to a reader. The actual Hα luminosity, LHα, that we estimated from the observed line flux in the spectrum is ∼9.2×1037 to 3.4 ×1038 erg s-1. The "6.7 × 1049 to 2.5 × 1050" written in that passage of the published article is actually referring to the number of Lyman continuum photons, NLyC. This is purely a typographical error. Again, following Martins et al. (2005), NLyC is still equivalent to 1-4 O3 I stars or 4-15 O5 V stars. We stress that the end result of that calculation and discussion are totally unaffected. Additionally, in Sections 2.3 and 4.1 and in Figure 8, we refer to the pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 images as being from 2006 October 20, whereas these data are from 2007 December 11. Again, this is a typographical error and has absolutely no effect on the detection and characterization of the supernova progenitor candidate. The overall conclusions of the paper remain entirely unchanged.
AB - On page 16 of the published article, the sentence that begins as, We indeed detect such emission, particularly in the early-time MMT spectrumK, is written incorrectly and would be misleading to a reader. The actual Hα luminosity, LHα, that we estimated from the observed line flux in the spectrum is ∼9.2×1037 to 3.4 ×1038 erg s-1. The "6.7 × 1049 to 2.5 × 1050" written in that passage of the published article is actually referring to the number of Lyman continuum photons, NLyC. This is purely a typographical error. Again, following Martins et al. (2005), NLyC is still equivalent to 1-4 O3 I stars or 4-15 O5 V stars. We stress that the end result of that calculation and discussion are totally unaffected. Additionally, in Sections 2.3 and 4.1 and in Figure 8, we refer to the pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 images as being from 2006 October 20, whereas these data are from 2007 December 11. Again, this is a typographical error and has absolutely no effect on the detection and characterization of the supernova progenitor candidate. The overall conclusions of the paper remain entirely unchanged.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057440938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057440938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec07
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec07
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85057440938
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 868
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 77
ER -