Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))

E. Paterson; P. M. Sanderson; N. A.B. Paterson; R. G. Loeb

doi:10.1093/bja/aex429

Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))

E. Paterson
, P. M. Sanderson
, N. A.B. Paterson
, R. G. Loeb

Anesthesiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017; 1–7, DOI 10.1093/bja/aex343 The above paper has been adapted to add the editor's key points. The Publisher would like to apologise for the omission in the original paper.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1249
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume	119
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex429
State	Published - Dec 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Access to Document

10.1093/bja/aex429

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Paterson, E., Sanderson, P. M., Paterson, N. A. B., & Loeb, R. G. (2017). Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343)). British Journal of Anaesthesia, 119(6), 1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex429

Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343)). / Paterson, E.; Sanderson, P. M.; Paterson, N. A.B. et al.
In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 119, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 1249.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Paterson, E, Sanderson, PM, Paterson, NAB & Loeb, RG 2017, 'Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))', British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex429

Paterson E, Sanderson PM, Paterson NAB, Loeb RG. Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343)). British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017 Dec;119(6):1249. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex429

Paterson, E. ; Sanderson, P. M. ; Paterson, N. A.B. et al. / Erratum : Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343)). In: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017 ; Vol. 119, No. 6. pp. 1249.

@article{d879de5f428347d88c0575b328bcca8a,

title = "Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))",

abstract = "British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017; 1–7, DOI 10.1093/bja/aex343 The above paper has been adapted to add the editor's key points. The Publisher would like to apologise for the omission in the original paper.",

author = "E. Paterson and Sanderson, \{P. M.\} and Paterson, \{N. A.B.\} and Loeb, \{R. G.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Author(s)",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1093/bja/aex429",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "119",

pages = "1249",

journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",

issn = "0007-0912",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))

AU - Paterson, E.

AU - Sanderson, P. M.

AU - Paterson, N. A.B.

AU - Loeb, R. G.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017; 1–7, DOI 10.1093/bja/aex343 The above paper has been adapted to add the editor's key points. The Publisher would like to apologise for the omission in the original paper.

AB - British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017; 1–7, DOI 10.1093/bja/aex343 The above paper has been adapted to add the editor's key points. The Publisher would like to apologise for the omission in the original paper.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047406210

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047406210#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1093/bja/aex429

DO - 10.1093/bja/aex429

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85047406210

SN - 0007-0912

VL - 119

SP - 1249

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

IS - 6

ER -

Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this