Abstract
Results In the published article, there was an error in Figures 5 and 6, containing contrast curves for different postprocessing techniques. This only affects the “mJy as −2” axis. To convert from contrast to mJy as −2, there is Jrst a middle step to convert to (ct s −1), after which there is a simple multiplication by 0.1765 (G. Schneider et al. 2014). To convert from contrast to counts, however, we must multiply by the Data Number rate in [ct s −1], which takes the gain into account (2.24E8 [ct s −1]). However, for the numbers in both Jgures, we accidentally multiplied by the “peak pixel” value, which is in [e s −1] (914,424,193 [e s −1]). As a consequence of this, at 1″, we get 2.39 (per the old, incorrect Jgures) instead of 0.59 (quoted in the published article). This is rectified here, and revised versions of Figures 5 and 6 are below. (Figure presented).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 63 |
| Journal | Astronomical Journal |
| Volume | 170 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Jul 1 2025 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Deepest Limits on Scattered Light Emission from the Epsilon Eridani Inner Debris Disk with HST/STIS (AJ (2024) 168 (169) DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6efe)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS