TY - JOUR
T1 - Episodic memory reconsolidation
T2 - Updating or source confusion?
AU - Hupbach, Almut
AU - Gomez, Rebecca
AU - Nadel, Lynn
N1 - Funding Information:
Address correspondence to: Dr Almut Hupbach, Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. E-mail: [email protected] We thank Amanda Brewer, Rabiah Muhammad, and Michael Weiss for helping with data collection. This research was funded by NSF grant BCS-0743988. We thank Marcia Johnson and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as "reconsolidation". Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.
AB - Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as "reconsolidation". Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.
KW - Memory reconsolidation
KW - Misinformation effect
KW - Recognition
KW - Source memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68349158883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68349158883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09658210902882399
DO - 10.1080/09658210902882399
M3 - Article
C2 - 19468955
AN - SCOPUS:68349158883
SN - 0965-8211
VL - 17
SP - 502
EP - 510
JO - Memory
JF - Memory
IS - 5
ER -