TY - JOUR
T1 - Employment of young adult cancer caregivers, other disease caregivers, and non-caregiving adults
AU - Warner, Echo L.
AU - Wilson, Andrew R.
AU - Rainbow, Jessica G.
AU - Ellington, Lee
AU - Kirchhoff, Anne C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, grant number F31CA221000 and T32CA078447 to E.L.W. and P30CA042014 to M.B. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Warner was also financially supported during this work on a fellowship from the Jonas Center for Nursing and Veteran’s Healthcare.
Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, grant number F31CA221000 and T32CA078447 to E.L.W. and P30CA042014 to M.B. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Warner was also financially supported during this work on a fellowship from the Jonas Center for Nursing and Veteran?s Healthcare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/7/2
Y1 - 2021/7/2
N2 - Young adults are increasingly taking on caregiving roles in the United States, and cancer caregivers often experience a greater burden than other caregivers. An unexpected caregiving role may disrupt caregiver employment, leading to lost earning potential and workforce re-entry chal-lenges. We examined caregiving employment among young adult caregivers (i.e., family or friends) using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which included caregiving, em-ployment, and sociodemographic variables. Respondents’ ages varied between 18 and 39, and they were categorized as non-caregivers (n = 16,009), other caregivers (n = 3512), and cancer caregivers (n = 325). Current employment was compared using Poisson regressions to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), including gender-stratified models. We estimated employment by cancer caregiving intensity (low, moderate, high). Cancer caregivers at all other income levels were more likely to be employed than those earning below USD 20,000 (aIRR ranged: 1.88–2.10, all p < 0.015). Female cancer caregivers who were 25–29 (aIRR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.51–1.00) and single (aIRR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52–0.95) were less likely to be employed than their counterparts. College-educated males were 19% less likely to be employed than high school-educated caregivers (95% CI = 0.68–0.98). Evaluating caregiver employment goals and personal financial situations may help identify those at risk for employment detriments, especially among females, those with lower educational attainment, and those earning below USD 20,000 annually.
AB - Young adults are increasingly taking on caregiving roles in the United States, and cancer caregivers often experience a greater burden than other caregivers. An unexpected caregiving role may disrupt caregiver employment, leading to lost earning potential and workforce re-entry chal-lenges. We examined caregiving employment among young adult caregivers (i.e., family or friends) using the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), which included caregiving, em-ployment, and sociodemographic variables. Respondents’ ages varied between 18 and 39, and they were categorized as non-caregivers (n = 16,009), other caregivers (n = 3512), and cancer caregivers (n = 325). Current employment was compared using Poisson regressions to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), including gender-stratified models. We estimated employment by cancer caregiving intensity (low, moderate, high). Cancer caregivers at all other income levels were more likely to be employed than those earning below USD 20,000 (aIRR ranged: 1.88–2.10, all p < 0.015). Female cancer caregivers who were 25–29 (aIRR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.51–1.00) and single (aIRR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.52–0.95) were less likely to be employed than their counterparts. College-educated males were 19% less likely to be employed than high school-educated caregivers (95% CI = 0.68–0.98). Evaluating caregiver employment goals and personal financial situations may help identify those at risk for employment detriments, especially among females, those with lower educational attainment, and those earning below USD 20,000 annually.
KW - Cancer caregiver
KW - Caregiver
KW - Caregiving intensity
KW - Employment
KW - adolescent and young adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109517977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109517977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph18147452
DO - 10.3390/ijerph18147452
M3 - Article
C2 - 34299903
AN - SCOPUS:85109517977
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 18
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 14
M1 - 7452
ER -