TY - JOUR
T1 - Empirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world
AU - Smith, Marielle N.
AU - Taylor, Tyeen C.
AU - van Haren, Joost
AU - Rosolem, Rafael
AU - Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia
AU - Adams, John
AU - Wu, Jin
AU - de Oliveira, Raimundo C.
AU - da Silva, Rodrigo
AU - de Araujo, Alessandro C.
AU - de Camargo, Plinio B.
AU - Huxman, Travis E.
AU - Saleska, Scott R.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank E. A. Yepez and J. Garatuza-Payan for providing the Tesopaco eddy flux data and J. Berry for the leaf-level chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, collected at B2 in collaboration with J.A. We thank M. Strangstalien, B. Enquist and A. Swann for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Partnerships for International Research and Education (PIRE) (no. OISE-0730305) and the Philecological Foundation, with additional support from the US Department of Energy (DOE) (GOAmazon award no. 3002937712), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (LBA-DMIP project, award no. NNX09AL52G) and the University of Arizona’s Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice. M.N.S. and J.W. were supported by the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship (NESSF) program (grant no. NNX14AK95H). In addition, J.W. was partly supported by the DOE’s next-generation ecosystem experiments project in the tropics (NGEE-Tropics) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. T.C.T. was supported by the NSF Division of Biological Infrastructure with grant no. NSF‐PRFB‐1711997. The meteorological data collection and quality control analysis of the B2-TF dataset by R.R. were also supported by the NESSF program (grant no. NNX09AO33H) and the UK National Environment Research Council (NERC, grant nos NE/M003086/1 and NE/R004897/1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Tropical forests may be vulnerable to climate change1–3 if photosynthetic carbon uptake currently operates near a high temperature limit4–6. Predicting tropical forest function requires understanding the relative contributions of two mechanisms of high-temperature photosynthetic declines: stomatal limitation (H1), an indirect response due to temperature-associated changes in atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD)7, and biochemical restrictions (H2), a direct temperature response8,9. Their relative control predicts different outcomes—H1 is expected to diminish with stomatal responses to future co-occurring elevated atmospheric [CO2], whereas H2 portends declining photosynthesis with increasing temperatures. Distinguishing the two mechanisms at high temperatures is therefore critical, but difficult because VPD is highly correlated with temperature in natural settings. We used a forest mesocosm to quantify the sensitivity of tropical gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) to future temperature regimes while constraining VPD by controlling humidity. We then analytically decoupled temperature and VPD effects under current climate with flux-tower-derived GEP trends in situ from four tropical forest sites. Both approaches showed consistent, negative sensitivity of GEP to VPD but little direct response to temperature. Importantly, in the mesocosm at low VPD, GEP persisted up to 38 °C, a temperature exceeding projections for tropical forests in 2100 (ref. 10). If elevated [CO2] mitigates VPD-induced stomatal limitation through enhanced water-use efficiency as hypothesized9,11, tropical forest photosynthesis may have a margin of resilience to future warming.
AB - Tropical forests may be vulnerable to climate change1–3 if photosynthetic carbon uptake currently operates near a high temperature limit4–6. Predicting tropical forest function requires understanding the relative contributions of two mechanisms of high-temperature photosynthetic declines: stomatal limitation (H1), an indirect response due to temperature-associated changes in atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD)7, and biochemical restrictions (H2), a direct temperature response8,9. Their relative control predicts different outcomes—H1 is expected to diminish with stomatal responses to future co-occurring elevated atmospheric [CO2], whereas H2 portends declining photosynthesis with increasing temperatures. Distinguishing the two mechanisms at high temperatures is therefore critical, but difficult because VPD is highly correlated with temperature in natural settings. We used a forest mesocosm to quantify the sensitivity of tropical gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) to future temperature regimes while constraining VPD by controlling humidity. We then analytically decoupled temperature and VPD effects under current climate with flux-tower-derived GEP trends in situ from four tropical forest sites. Both approaches showed consistent, negative sensitivity of GEP to VPD but little direct response to temperature. Importantly, in the mesocosm at low VPD, GEP persisted up to 38 °C, a temperature exceeding projections for tropical forests in 2100 (ref. 10). If elevated [CO2] mitigates VPD-induced stomatal limitation through enhanced water-use efficiency as hypothesized9,11, tropical forest photosynthesis may have a margin of resilience to future warming.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092504347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092504347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41477-020-00780-2
DO - 10.1038/s41477-020-00780-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33051618
AN - SCOPUS:85092504347
SN - 2055-026X
VL - 6
SP - 1225
EP - 1230
JO - Nature Plants
JF - Nature Plants
IS - 10
ER -