Abstract
Cases discovered in the British Colonial Office archives of the 1920s and 1930s show how different branches of the imperial state struggled with interracial couples and families to define their rightful place in the empire. As discursive analysis historically contextualised shows, state servants striving to maintain colonial power relations held assumptions about racial and cultural differences that reacted in unpredictable ways with their deeply gendered and classed judgements about interracial marriages and the women in them. This evidence reveals that racial distinction or 'whiteness' was neither the sole nor even the primary variable driving these decisions. Discourses of gender, class, culture, sexual danger and spatial location were equally powerful.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5-28+IV |
Journal | Gender and History |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2005 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Geography, Planning and Development
- History
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)