TY - JOUR
T1 - Emotional labor actors
T2 - A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies
AU - Gabriel, Allison S.
AU - Daniels, Michael A.
AU - Diefendorff, James M.
AU - Greguras, Gary J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Research on emotional labor focuses on how employees utilize 2 main regulation strategies-surface acting (i.e., faking one's felt emotions) and deep acting (i.e., attempting to feel required emotions)-to adhere to emotional expectations of their jobs. To date, researchers largely have considered how each strategy functions to predict outcomes in isolation. However, this variable-centered perspective ignores the possibility that there are subpopulations of employees who may differ in their combined use of surface and deep acting. To address this issue, we conducted 2 studies that examined surface acting and deep acting from a person-centered perspective. Using latent profile analysis, we identified 5 emotional labor profiles-non-actors, low actors, surface actors, deep actors, and regulators-and found that these actor profiles were distinguished by several emotional labor antecedents (positive affectivity, negative affectivity, display rules, customer orientation, and emotion demands-abilities fit) and differentially predicted employee outcomes (emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and felt inauthenticity). Our results reveal new insights into the nature of emotion regulation in emotional labor contexts and how different employees may characteristically use distinct combinations of emotion regulation strategies to manage their emotional expressions at work.
AB - Research on emotional labor focuses on how employees utilize 2 main regulation strategies-surface acting (i.e., faking one's felt emotions) and deep acting (i.e., attempting to feel required emotions)-to adhere to emotional expectations of their jobs. To date, researchers largely have considered how each strategy functions to predict outcomes in isolation. However, this variable-centered perspective ignores the possibility that there are subpopulations of employees who may differ in their combined use of surface and deep acting. To address this issue, we conducted 2 studies that examined surface acting and deep acting from a person-centered perspective. Using latent profile analysis, we identified 5 emotional labor profiles-non-actors, low actors, surface actors, deep actors, and regulators-and found that these actor profiles were distinguished by several emotional labor antecedents (positive affectivity, negative affectivity, display rules, customer orientation, and emotion demands-abilities fit) and differentially predicted employee outcomes (emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and felt inauthenticity). Our results reveal new insights into the nature of emotion regulation in emotional labor contexts and how different employees may characteristically use distinct combinations of emotion regulation strategies to manage their emotional expressions at work.
KW - Deep acting
KW - Emotional labor
KW - Employee well-being
KW - Latent profile analysis
KW - Surface acting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929025376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929025376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0037408
DO - 10.1037/a0037408
M3 - Article
C2 - 25068812
AN - SCOPUS:84929025376
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 100
SP - 863
EP - 879
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 3
ER -